Analytical Sciences
Online ISSN : 1348-2246
Print ISSN : 0910-6340
ISSN-L : 0910-6340
Original Papers
Theoretical Analysis of Tablet Hardness Prediction Using Chemoinformetric Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Hideaki TANABEKuniko OTSUKAMakoto OTSUKA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2007 Volume 23 Issue 7 Pages 857-862

Details
Abstract

In order to clarify the theoretical basis of the variability in the measurement of tablet hardness by compression pressure, NIR spectroscopic methods were used to predict tablet hardness of the formulations. Tablets (200 mg, 8 mm in diameter) consisting of berberine chloride, lactose, and potato starch were formed at various compression pressures (59, 78, 98, 127, 195 MPa). The hardness and the distribution of micropores were measured. The reflectance NIR spectra of various compressed tablets were used as a calibration set to establish a calibration model to predict tablet hardness by principal component regression (PCR) analysis. The distribution of micropores was shifted to a smaller pore size with increasing compression pressure. The total pore volume of tablets decreased as the compression pressure increased. The hardness increased as the compression pressure increased. The hardness could be predicted using a calibration model consisting of 7 principal components (PCs) obtained by PCR. The relationship between the predicted and the actual hardness values exhibited a straight line, an R2 of 0.925. In order to understand the theoretical analysis (scientific background) of calibration models used to evaluate tablet hardness, the standard error of cross validation (SEV) values, the loading vectors of each PC and the regression vector were investigated. The result obtained with the calibration models for hardness suggested that the regression vector might involve physical and chemical factors. In contrast, the porosity could be predicted using a calibration model composed of 2 PCs. The relationship between the predicted and the actual total pore volume showed a straight line with R2 = 0.801. The regression vector of the total pore volume might be due to physical factors.

Content from these authors
© 2007 by The Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top