Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Clinical Investigation
Prevalence and Impact of Renal Insufficiency on Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization
Qiang ZhangChang-Sheng MaShao-Ping NieXin DuQiang LvJun-Ping KangYin ZhangRong HuChang-Qi JiaXin-Min LiuXiao-Hui LiuJian-Zeng DongFang ChenYu-Jie ZhouShu-Zheng LvFang-Jiong HuangCheng-Xiong GuXue-Si Wu
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2007 Volume 71 Issue 8 Pages 1299-1304

Details
Abstract

Background Patients with renal insufficiency are more likely to die after coronary revascularization, but mild renal insufficiency is neglected and little is known about its clinical effects. Methods and Results In the present study 3,025 patients grouped by estimated creatinine clearance (CrCl) were analyzed to evaluate the association between CrCl and clinical outcome. The mean serum creatinine was 1.0±0.4 mg/dl, with 4.3% above normal; in 65.8% CrCl was <90 ml/min. During hospitalization, there were significant differences in mortality among the groups stratified by CrCl (p<0.0001). During follow-up after hospital discharge, there were significant differences in mortality (p<0.0001), new-onset myocardial infarction (p=0.007), and stroke (p=0.032). In patients with severe renal insufficiency, the in-hospital and follow-up mortality reached 15.4% and 31.3%, respectively. The independent risk factors for all-cause death after revascularization were the mode of revascularization, age and the CrCl level. In patients with mild renal insufficiency or normal renal function, the all-cause mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly lower than that after CABG. Conclusions Renal insufficiency is not rare in patients undergoing coronary revascularization and in the present study even mild renal insufficiency correlated with adverse clinical outcomes after revascularization. In patients with normal renal function or mild renal insufficiency, the mode of revascularization might lead to a prognostic difference. (Circ J 2007; 71: 1299 - 1304)

Content from these authors
© 2007 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top