Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Late Breaking Clinical Trials (JCS 2013)
Urgent Management of Rapid Heart Rate in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter and Left Ventricular Dysfunction
– Comparison of the Ultra-Short-Acting β1-Selective Blocker Landiolol With Digoxin (J-Land Study) –
Ryozo NagaiKoichiro KinugawaHiroshi InoueHirotsugu AtarashiYoshihiko SeinoTakeshi YamashitaWataru ShimizuTakeshi AibaMasafumi KitakazeAtsuhiro SakamotoTakanori IkedaYasushi ImaiTakashi DaimonKatsuhiro FujinoTetsuji NaganoTatsuaki OkamuraMasatsugu Horithe J-Land Investigators
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
Supplementary material

2013 Volume 77 Issue 4 Pages 908-916

Details
Abstract

Background: A rapid heart rate (HR) during atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction often impairs cardiac performance. The J-Land study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of landiolol, an ultra-short-acting β-blocker, with those of digoxin for swift control of tachycardia in AF/AFL in patients with LV dysfunction. Methods and Results: The 200 patients with AF/AFL, HR ≥120beats/min, and LV ejection fraction 25–50% were randomized to receive either landiolol (n=93) or digoxin (n=107). Successful HR control was defined as ≥20% reduction in HR together with HR <110beats/min at 2h after starting intravenous administration of landiolol or digoxin. The dose of landiolol was adjusted in the range of 1–10μg·kg–1·min–1 according to the patient’s condition. The mean HR at baseline was 138.2±15.7 and 138.0±15.0beats/min in the landiolol and digoxin groups, respectively. Successful HR control was achieved in 48.0% of patients treated with landiolol and in 13.9% of patients treated with digoxin (P<0.0001). Serious adverse events were reported in 2 and 3 patients in each group, respectively. Conclusions: Landiolol was more effective for controlling rapid HR than digoxin in AF/AFL patients with LV dysfunction, and could be considered as a therapeutic option in this clinical setting.  (Circ J 2013; 77: 908–916)

Content from these authors
© 2013 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top