Journal of the Geothermal Research Society of Japan
Online ISSN : 1883-5775
Print ISSN : 0388-6735
ISSN-L : 0388-6735
Current issue
Displaying 1-3 of 3 articles from this issue
Article
  • Gilbert BETT, Tatsuya WAKEYAMA, Yasuhiro FUJIMITSU
    Article type: Article
    2023 Volume 45 Issue 3 Pages 165-173
    Published: July 25, 2023
    Released on J-STAGE: January 25, 2024
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    Olkaria East and Southeast fields are part of the Olkaria geothermal complex, located in the eastern arm of the East African Rift System (EARS) and approximately 120 km from Nairobi, Kenya. It is the first geothermal field in the country to start power production in 1981 with Unit I (15 MWe). Geoscientific exploration confirms that the Olkaria complex is a highly faulted and fractured system dotted with geological features such as volcanic centres, Olkaria hill, and steam vents (fumaroles and steaming ground). The objective of this study was to investigate the temporal heat discharge (or loss) using surface temperature classification features of Landsat 8 images obtained from the U.S Geological Survey website on 11th July 2015. This involved mapping the localities of temperature anomalies where active geothermal land surface temperature recorded a maximum of 15.2862°C, where 3.943°C matched existing fumaroles. The radiated heat loss of about 0.4459 MW over 0.1494 km² was observed along fault structures. Non-geothermal related anomalies were masked that included radiated heat from power plants and constructions to improve the accuracy of the research output.

    Download PDF (12492K)
  • Toshihiro UCHIDA, Yusuke YAMAYA
    Article type: Article
    2023 Volume 45 Issue 3 Pages 175-194
    Published: July 25, 2023
    Released on J-STAGE: January 25, 2024
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    In order to examine the performance of three-dimensional (3D) inversion of magnetotelluric (MT) data for geothermal exploration, where accurate numerical modeling is necessary against rough topography variation, we have utilized two inversion codes, FEMTIC and WSINV3DMT, for 3D inversion of MT data obtained in a geothermal area near the Hakkoda volcano, northern Japan. FEMTIC, a finite-element modeling (FEM) code, can incorporate either tetrahedral elements or deformed non-conforming hexahedral elements in the 3D mesh, while WSINV3DMT, a finite-difference modeling (FDM) code, uses rectangular cells. We used the same subset of the MT data (all components of the impedance and tipper at 15 frequencies at 34 stations) for both inversions, with the same noise-floor setting. As a result, we have recognized that the resistivity model by the WSINV3DMT code produce small but extremely high- or low-resistivity anomalies at the ground surface and resistivity distribution becomes rough. In addition, several thin horizontal anomalies of high- and low-resistivities alternately appear in shallow parts. These anomalies seem to be due to numerical errors by the rectangular approximation of the boundary between the air and the ground. In contrast, the FEMTIC code does not have significant numerical errors by the approximation of topographic changes, and no such anomalous structures appear in shallow parts and the resistivity distribution at the surface is smooth. For deeper parts, models by FEMTIC and WSINV3DMT are generally similar, however, the shapes of the main low-resistivity layer, which corresponds to the clay cap of geothermal reservoirs, are different between them. The WSINV3DMT code tends to generate extreme resistivity anomalies in the deeper parts. Comparison with resistivity logging data in geothermal exploration wells shows better matching for the FEMTIC models than the WSINV3DMT models. These investigations suggest that the FEM inversion is more reliable than the FDM when we include the topography in the 3D MT inversion.

    Download PDF (22683K)
Technical Report
  • Kasumi YASUKAWA
    Article type: Technical Report
    2023 Volume 45 Issue 3 Pages 195-201
    Published: July 25, 2023
    Released on J-STAGE: January 25, 2024
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

    The number of countries which deploy ground source heat pump (GSHP) has been linearly increasing these 20 years. It means that GSHP can be applied almost everywhere on the globe but there are still many regions in which GSHP is not known and it has not been used yet. Meanwhile the world total GSHP capacity is increasing exponentially, showing that a quite rapid growth is possible once the value of GSHP is well known in the region.

    This paper shows statistic data on GSHP use of the world and of individual leading countries. There exists geographical bias of GSHP installation, not necessarily due to climate condition but due to cultural and economic ties of the nations. Histories of its deployment in leading countries revealed that there were policy supports on GSHP installation in most cases. In China, the federal government sets high national goals for its deployment and municipals put them into practice. In the USA, various financial supports were given to GSHP installation by state or municipal governments pushed by a private sector. In Switzerland and in Korea, it was obliged to apply one of energy saving systems for new buildings and GSHP had been chosen by majority of users. Considering the current publicity of GSHP in Japan, obligation type of policy support would be most effective for rapid growth of GSHP installation.

    Download PDF (2788K)
feedback
Top