日本建築学会計画系論文集
Online ISSN : 1881-8161
Print ISSN : 1340-4210
ISSN-L : 1340-4210
大坂町奉行所による寛文8年令規模解釈,および普請申請書類からみた,規模表現法と記載規模の実態について : 大坂町奉行所支配地域における寺院建築規制運用実態把握のための一試論
妻木 宣嗣青山 賢信
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

1999 年 64 巻 524 号 p. 281-288

詳細
抄録

In the Osaka magistrate office architectural control of temples, we have studied applications and pointed out following. 1. "Shikorohisashi" was classified "Shikoro" and "Hisashi", the former was 9-shaku and the latter 1-ken. 2. There are little applications whose scale of beam was over 3-ken. 3. The minimum scale of Hisashi, Shikoro and Geya was all 3-shaku, and the maximum of each 1.5-ken, 1.5-ken and 2-ken. 4. In changing the scale, most applications, whose scale of beam was within 5.5-ken, was presented. 5. It is confirmed no differences in usage of Hisashi, Shikoro and Geya, but the maximum scale was noticed.

著者関連情報
© 1999 日本建築学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top