日本建築学会計画系論文集
Online ISSN : 1881-8161
Print ISSN : 1340-4210
ISSN-L : 1340-4210
韓国住民自治センターにみる公共施設再編の方法論的研究
山岸 輝樹安藤 淳一広田 直行井原 徹若竹 雅宏
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2017 年 82 巻 741 号 p. 2789-2798

詳細
抄録

 The purpose of this study is to acquire knowledge concerning the methods of reorganization of public facilities in a mature society. To do so, this study aims to understand the characteristics of renovation methods and policy, the legislative system for resident autonomy centers in Korea. Subjects of the study are 1, 695 facilities listed in the " Compendium of the Operational Status of Resident Autonomy Centers Nationwide (1) (2) (3) " (hereinafter known as the "data sheet") issued by Korean Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs. Chapter 2 shows the characteristics of policies and the legislative system for the maintenance of resident autonomy centers. Here, analysis is performed from the aspect of facility details, policy, and legislation in connection with the establishment of resident autonomy centers. Chapter 3 clarifies the conditions of facility from 1999 to 2002 proportionate to the first stage of resident autonomy center. Chapter 4 reveals the redevelopment conditions of facilities from 2002 onward proportionate to the second stage of resident autonomy center. Chapter 5 uses knowledge acquired from the preceding three chapters to cover lessons to learn from the renovation of resident autonomy center in Korea in relation to the methods of public facility reorganization. In the course of reorganization for resident autonomy centers in Korea, policy changed from a "basic plan" to a feasible "completed guideline". Policy also evolved so that renovation could be carried out according to conditions. In terms of the legislative system, deregulation and legislation were advanced so that renovation could be revitalized. For the first stage, which was a period lasting from 1999 to 2002, the entire country prioritized the simultaneous provision of approximately 1,700 facilities and did so by uniformly re-purposing already existing facilities. In doing so, the serviced facilities didn't follow a similar standard and were each maintained in each region by different plans and forms. Prioritizing simultaneous maintenance may have been what produced plans and forms that could be realized in each region. In this regard, in the second stage that followed from 2003 onward, renovation of established facilities was carried out. The facilities to be renovated or abolished or rebuild, and the method for renovation were chosen according to the characteristics of each region and facility. In brief, there was merit in not following a uniform method and instead performing maintenance through individual solutions that could be implemented in areas where needed. At present, our country's facility reorganization plans for local governments take into consideration future cost reduction and tout the uniform reduction of the amount of facilities as the overall objective. Reorganization is being pushed through the amendment, abolition, and new construction of facilities under a long-term plan. It is also difficult to adopt various renovation methods from a legislation perspective. In this regard, the methods taken in Korea do not uniformly reduce the amount of facilities. Instead, upon advancing simultaneous restructuring by means of renovation in a short period across a whole area, places that aren't used depending on their usage situation and characteristics of the area are shutdown while places often sued and renovated. This method of reorganizing public facilities can be referred to as simultaneous renovation and sequential renovation. Unlike the method of sequential maintenance through new construction that has been pushed in our country up to now, the method of simultaneously and extensively maintaining necessary facilities and afterward advancing coordinative renovation according to condition will greatly serve as reference as a method of facility renovation for our country which is poised to become a mature and steady-state society.

著者関連情報
© 2017 日本建築学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top