Abstract
In Japan, the era of declining population, the approach to realize compact city is accelerating. In doing so, maintaining the Area Division is considered important for these. However, the operation of the Area Diversion in the era of population decline is inconsistent with the purpose and contents at the time of enactment. As a result, there is concern about maintaining Area Division. On the other hand, from the movement to improve the downtown, the deterioration of the convenience of living in the suburbs will be feared in the future. Based on the above, we recognize that the way the future of the Urbanization Promotion Area marginal area looks from the viewpoint of living convenience is an issue. Based on this fact, this study focuses on living convenience, considering the relationship between the development permitted area and the living convenience in the Urbanization Control Area, and considering how to induce development in the Urbanization Control Area.
In the selection of the target city, we set the conditions and target five cities of Ichikawa City, Kusatsu City, Funabashi City, Mito City, Yachiyo City, which satisfy them.
First, we analyzed the living convenience situation of the target city. As a result, the existence of convenient areas with the same level as the Urbanization Promotion Area was confirmed in each city even in the Urbanization Control Area.
Secondly, we will grasp the content of ordinance development in Urbanization Control Area and analyze distribution of development permission area. when arranging the designation of the area specified in Article 34, No. 11 of the city planning law, there are condition designation (Ichikawa city, Funabashi city, Yachiyo city) and specified designation (Kusatsu city). Also, in Mito city, both designations are used in combination. Next, we look at the characteristics of the distribution of the development permitted area in the Urbanization Control Area. Under the condition designation is to be seen that is development in enclaves from the urbanization area and cities where urban sprawl development is being done (Funabashi city and Mito city) . Specific designation is developed in a certain area within a certain area and is characterized by highly developed proximity to Urbanization Promotion area. It is consistent with the land use shown in the city Planning Master Plan.
Thirdly, the living convenience of the development permitted area in the Urbanization Control Area was evaluated As a result, Kusatsu City has many developments in areas with higher convenience than the other four cities, and development in areas with low convenience is small.
Based on the above, in Kusatsu City in this research subject city, As a result there are many developments in the high area of convenience. Because it does not specify standards in the ordinance, but considering the convenience as a social condition and specifying the developable area. In addition, the operation of Kusatsu City is strongly consistent with the land use policy shown in the Urban Planning Master Plan, so it can be said that the operation of the 3411 ordinance is different from other cities. Through these measures, by increasing the number of residents in the area with high convenience even in the Urbanization Control Area, we have stopped withdrawing the living-based convenience facilities from the suburbs, the sustainability of the suburbs has increased and the landowners in the adjustment area are raised I think that consideration can be made.
As above, the way of development permission operation in the Urbanization Control Area, if the area with high convenience is seen in the Urbanization Control Area of the urbanization promotion area margin, I think that it is worth considering allowing development aggressively.
