J-STAGE トップ  >  資料トップ  > 書誌事項

日本建築学会技術報告集
Vol. 17 (2011) No. 35 p. 67-72

記事言語:

http://doi.org/10.3130/aijt.17.67

構造

We performed a benchmark test for the strong motion simulation methods using numerical methods (finite difference method and finite element method). All the results calculated by six teams from different institutions generally show good agreement to each other. We found minor differences are generated by the choice of property on the grid just at the boundary of layers. The performance of absorbing zone makes differences in terms of artificial reflection waves from the model boundary.

Copyright © 2011 日本建築学会

記事ツール

この記事を共有