自主シンポジウムI: 「教師のリーダーシップ

その測定方法と妥当性

抄録

At first, Misumie xplainedw hy we planedt his symposium: Most of the measurement scaleso f teachers'l eadershipw hichh ave beenu sed these days seemedt o be improper. Using such scales,t he developmenot f teachers' leaderships tudyc ouldn ot be expected. Then we proposed the teachers' leadership and the school morale measurement scales which have beenm ade for the past year. We wanted to be criticizedo n them at this symposiums o that we mightd evelopa better measuremenmt ethodo f the teachers'l eadership. Regardingt his studya s one step of studyingt eachers'l eadershipw, e plannedt o discussa t the symposium, whati t shouldb e. Next, Misumci omparedt he present situationo f the leaderships tudiesi in Industrial Organizationo r GovernmenOt fficesw ith those in educationalw orld. He explained the theoreticalf rameworko f P-M leadershipt heory. Two symposistsm ade the following reports.
Symposist: Yoshizaki
At first, he reviewedt he past studieso f teachers' leadershipm ainlyi n Japan. Then he broughtup five problems. Next, he explained our study: The measurement of teachers' leadership was conducted by distributing a questionnaire to pupils, asking them to rate their teachers. Subjects were 3010 5 and 6 graders. First we conducted questionnaire items normal varimax method and there were five factors in teachers' leadership behavior. Secondly we conducted them on a group principal method for selecting questionnaire items of P(Performance)and M(Maintenance)scales. The school morale measurement scales were made at the same procedure as the leadership scales.
Symposist: Shinohara
Teachers' leadership was divided into four types, depending on the intensity of the two dimensions(P dimension, M dimension). The relationship of four leadership types to pupils' school morale was examined. As the result, PM came first, followed by M, P, and pm in that order, and the differences were statistically significant.