Assessment of Adherence to Post-exposure Prophylaxis with Oseltamivir in Healthcare Workers: A Retrospective Questionnaire-Based Study

抄録

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for healthcare workers is one of the effective strategies for preventing nosocomial outbreaks of influenza. However, PEP adherence in healthcare workers is rarely analysed, and no strategies have been established to improve adherence to PEP for healthcare workers. We aimed to retrospectively analyse adherence to PEP and the factors associated with non-adherence in healthcare workers. A survey of 221 healthcare workers who were eligible for PEP at Tokushima University Hospital in the 2016/2017 season was conducted. Once-daily oseltamivir (75 mg for 10 d) was used as the PEP regimen. Of the 221 healthcare workers, 175 received PEP and were surveyed for adherence using a questionnaire. Of the 130 healthcare workers who responded to the questionnaire, 121 (93.1%) had been vaccinated. In this survey, 82 healthcare workers (63.1%) did not fully complete PEP. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that physicians (odds ratio: 4.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.08–10.25) and non-vaccination (odds ratio: 9.60, 95% CI: 1.12–82.25) were the factors for non-adherence to PEP. Of the 47 healthcare workers who responded to the item regarding reasons for non-adherence, 36 (76.6%) reported forgetting to take oseltamivir or discontinuing it due to a misguided self-decision that continuation of PEP was unnecessary, and 5 (10.6%) reported discontinuing treatment due to adverse effects. In conclusion, healthcare workers, particularly physicians, had low PEP adherence owing to forgetting or stopping to take oseltamivir due to a misguided self-decision. To obtain the maximum preventive effect of PEP, medication education should be provided to endorse PEP compliance.