柔道競技における主審・副審の投技の同時評価に関する調査研究
2004 年 37 巻 1 号 p. 11-20
詳細
2004 年 37 巻 1 号 p. 11-20
The purpose of this study was to define simultaneous refereeing, in which “waza” is evaluated by a referee and two judges at the same time, and to clarify views on waza evaluation judged by this method, by administering a questionnaire to university Judo players and official referees of the All Japan Judo Federation. Findings:
1. Contestants have a more favorable view of their waza evaluation by simultaneous refereeing. They are confident in their points and attain a visual advantage in the contest.
2. Referees had a feeling of no visual advantage by this method when they missed making immediate evaluations. They tended to avoid giving the bad impression of controlling the contest, for fear of not making a fair and just decision.
3. Both contestants and referees consider that simultaneous refereeing prevents “ambiguity” in waza evaluation with active participation of referees, and the judgment becomes more impartial as a result. However, involvement of referees in evaluating judges leads to an unfair feeling of judgment, which referees and judges consider is a disadvantage of the method.
4. Evaluating some wazas, that are not well observed by referees are considered unfair in simultaneous refereeing by judges and referees, however contestants do not feel so.
5. Judges tend to think that the referee's concentration on the contest declines and mutual collaboration between judges deteriorates in simultaneous refereeing. Many contestants consider the quality of refereeing will improve by this method.
6. Efficiency, approval and introduction of simultaneous refereeing is accepted among contestants. Comparatively judges have a tendency toward a negative opinion of this method.
