Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Clinical Investigation
Office Cardiologists Cooperative Study on Whole Blood Rapid Panel Tests in Patients With Suspicious Acute Myocardial Infarction
Comparison Between Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein and Troponin T Tests
Yoshihiko SeinoYoshifumi TomitaTeruo TakanoKanji Ohbayashifor the Tokyo Rapid-test Office Cardiologists (Tokyo-ROC) Study
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2004 Volume 68 Issue 2 Pages 144-148

Details
Abstract

Background The whole blood rapid troponin T test, used to determine the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), is effective only for 3-4 h after onset. Methods and Results The present office cardiologists cooperative study compared the diagnostic efficacy of a newly developed whole blood rapid panel test for heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) with that of the rapid troponin T test in 129 consecutive patients with suspicious AMI according to certain time-frames from onset to presentation. Thirty-one patients (24.0%) had a final diagnosis of AMI. The respective sensitivities of the rapid H-FABP and troponin T tests were 100% vs 50% (p<0.05) for patients presenting within 3 h of onset; 75% vs 0% for those between 3 and 6 h; 100% vs 60% for those between 6 and 12 h; and 100% vs 100% for those presenting later than 12 h. The respective specificities were 63% vs 96.3% (p<0.05); 93.8% vs 93.8%; 72.7% vs 100%; and 75.0% vs 87.5%. Negative predictive value was 100% vs 86.7%; 93.8% vs 78.9%; 100% vs 84.6%; and 100% vs 100%, respectively. Patients with non-AMI myocardial damage associated with unstable angina or severe heart failure showed positive H-FABP test results and blunted the specificity. Conclusions When using the novel rapid H-FABP test, cardiac emergency triage to exclude non-AMI patients should be effectively organized within 3 h of onset. (Circ J 2004; 68: 144 - 148)

Related papers from these authors
© 2004 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top