Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Rapid Communications
Proposed Cutoff Value of Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity for the Management of Hypertension
Toshiaki OhkumaHirofumi TomiyamaToshiharu NinomiyaKazuomi KarioSatoshi HoshideYoshikuni KitaToyoshi InoguchiYasutaka MaedaKatsuhiko KoharaYasuharu TabaraMotoyuki NakamuraTakayoshi OhkuboHirotaka WatadaMasanori MunakataMitsuru OhishiNorihisa ItoMichinari NakamuraTetsuo ShojiCharalambos VlachopoulosAkira Yamashinaon behalf of the Collaborative Group for Japan Brachial-Ankle pulse wave VELocity individual participant data meta-analysis of prospective studies (J-BAVEL)
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML
Supplementary material

2017 Volume 81 Issue 10 Pages 1540-1542

Details
Abstract

Background: The optimal cutoff values of the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) were examined in patients with hypertension.

Methods and Results: A total of 7,656 participants were followed prospectively. The hazard ratio for the development of CVD increased significantly as the baPWV increased, independent of conventional risk factors. The receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the optimal cutoff values for predicting CVD was 18.3 m/s. This cutoff value significantly predicted THE incidence of CVD.

Conclusions: The present analysis suggests that the optimal cutoff value for CVD in patients with hypertension is 18.3 m/s.

Several prospective studies have demonstrated that arterial stiffness, which is assessed by measuring the pulse wave velocity (PWV), is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD).1,2 In the clinical setting, carotid-femoral PWV (cfPWV) and brachial-ankle PWV (baPWV) are available as measures of arterial stiffness.1 The 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension described cfPWV ≥10 m/s as a marker of vascular damage, and as an important parameter in deciding the most appropriate strategy for the management of hypertension.3 Because it is simple to measure (i.e., just by wrapping pressure cuffs around the upper arms and lower legs), baPWV measurement is more widely applicable.1 Recently, we reported from an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis that the baPWV can enhance the efficacy of risk prediction of development of CVD over that of the Framingham risk score.2 We conducted the present study to determine the cutoff value of baPWV for predicting the development of CVD (i.e., as a marker of vascular damage) in subjects with hypertension.

Methods

Japan Brachial-Ankle pulse wave VELocity individual participant data meta-analysis of prospective studies (J-BAVEL) is an IPD meta-analysis examining the association of baPWV with the risk of development of CVD. Previous IPD meta-analysis2 included 14,673 participants without pre-existing CVD from 8 studies (5 published studies48 and 3 unpublished studies911). Among them, 7,656 subjects with hypertension (defined as blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mmHg and/or current use of antihypertensive agents) were included in the present study. During the follow-up period, the patients’ vital status and incidence of CVD (defined as the incidence of stroke and ischemic heart disease) were ascertained.

The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the outcomes were estimated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards regression model, in which the cohort effect was adjusted as a fixed effect by taking each cohort as a strata variable. The pooled risk estimates per every 1 standard deviation (SD) increase of the baPWV levels were estimated by the relevant Cox model, with the baPWV included as a continuous variable. To confirm the optimal cutoff value of baPWV for predicting the future risk of CVD, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. The point on the ROC curve that yielded the figure closest to the ideal of 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity and the value that minimized the Youden Index were calculated.

Results

The mean age of the study subjects was 64 years, and the proportion of men was 47%. Mean values of baPWV, brachial systolic BP, brachial diastolic BP, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), serum total cholesterol, serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and estimated glomerular filtration rate12 were 17.87 m/s, 146 mmHg, 85 mmHg, 6.1%, 24.3 kg/m2, 206.5 mg/dL, 58.5 mg/dL, and 72.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The proportion of subjects with a current smoking habit was 17%.

During the follow-up period, a total of 486 participants developed CVD. The age- and sex-adjusted pooled HR for the development of CVD increased by 14% (95% CI, 5–25%) per every 1 SD increase of the baPWV. This association remained significant even after adjusting for age, sex, brachial systolic BP, history of use of antihypertensive agents, HbA1c, BMI, serum total cholesterol, serum HDL cholesterol, and current smoking habit (HR, 1.15; 95% CI 1.04–1.27).

The optimal cutoff point of baPWV on the ROC curve that yielded a value closest to the ideal of 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity, and the point that minimized the Youden Index was baPWV=18.3 m/s (Figure). The sensitivity and specificity of this cutoff value were 56.2% and 63.4%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.629. This cutoff value significantly predicted incidence of CVD after adjustment for the aforementioned confounding factors (Table; multivariate-adjusted HR, 1.33; 95% CI 1.06–1.67).

Figure.

Cutoff value of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) that allows for optimal discrimination between patients at risk and not at risk of development of cardiovascular disease in the future: (A) the length to (0, 1) on the receiver-operating characteristics (ROC curve) and (B) the Youden Index.

Table. HRs and 95% CIs for CVD According to baPWV Levels in Patients With Hypertension
baPWV (m/s) No. of events/
no. of subjects
Age- and sex-adjusted Multivariate-adjusted*
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
CVD (n=7,656, events=486)
 <18.30 213/4,756 1.00 (Ref.)   1.00 (Ref.)  
 ≥18.30 273/2,900 1.33 (1.09–1.63) <0.001 1.33 (1.06–1.67) 0.01

The Ehime Study, Hisayama Study, Iwate Study, Ohasama Study, Takashima Study, the Japan Morning Surge Home Blood Pressure (J-HOP) study, the Non-invasive Atherosclerotic evaluation of Hypertension (NOAH) study, and Kyushu Prevention Study of Atherosclerosis study cohorts were included in the analysis. CVD in the Ohasama study was defined as a composite of CVD death and stroke. *Adjusted for age, sex, brachial systolic blood pressure, history of use of antihypertensive agents, hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, serum total cholesterol, serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and current smoking habit. Subjects without missing values for covariates were included in the multivariate-adjusted model (n=6,933). baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio.

Discussion

In the guidelines for the management of hypertension,3,13 the assessment of subclinical organ damage is an important clue to determining the most appropriate strategy for the management of hypertension. The IPD meta-analysis demonstrated that the cfPWV is an independent risk factor for the future development of CVD,14 and the 2013 ESC/ESH guideline for the management of hypertension proposed cfPWV as a marker of subclinical organ damage.3 As previously reported, according to an analysis using a multivariate model with adjustment for the conventional risk factors for CVD, baPWV is an independent risk factor for the development of CVD, but not for all-cause death.2 The present study identified baPWV ≥18.3 m/s as a cutoff value for the development of CVD in subjects with hypertension.

Increased arterial stiffness is thought to increase the risk of development of CVD via a variety of mechanisms other than atherosclerotic plaque formation.2 However, subjects with hypertension are likely to have endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation, potentially leading to plaque formation and rupture.1,2 Our analysis revealed that the optimal cutoff value derived from the ROC curve was a significant predictor for the development of CVD, independent of conventional risk factors. Therefore, it may be reasonable to apply baPWV ≥18.3 m/s as a marker of subclinical organ damage in the CVD risk assessment of patients with hypertension. Although we should make clear that the use of a threshold is meant to simplify the estimation of risk by physicians in everyday clinical practice, this cutoff value is not the cutoff point for binary discrimination of the patient’s cardiovascular risk status, because the cardiovascular risk increases continuously along with the increase of the baPWV values (e.g., the cut-of value in subjects including the general population is 15.9 m/s).2

In conclusion, in subjects with hypertension, the baPWV is a predictor of the risk of development of CVD, independent of the conventional risk factors, and 18.3 m/s may be considered as a reference value for the cardiovascular risk assessment.

Sources of Funding

This study was supported by Omron Health Care Company (Kyoto, Japan), which awarded a grant to the baPWV IPD meta-analysis study group.

Disclosures

H.T. and A.Y. received research grants from Omron Health Care Company (Kyoto, Japan) and Asahi food and health care (Tokyo, Japan).

Supplementary Files

Supplementary File 1

Appendix S1. J-BAVEL Collaborators

Please find supplementary file(s);

http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0636

References
 
© 2017 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
feedback
Top