Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Impact of Pre-Existing Bradycardia on Subsequent Need for Pacemaker Implantation After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
Tetsuma KawajiSatoshi ShizutaShintaro YamagamiTakanori AizawaTakashi YoshizawaMasashi KatoTakafumi YokomatsuShinji MikiKoh OnoTakeshi Kimura
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML Advance online publication
Supplementary material

Article ID: CJ-18-0214

Details
Abstract

Background:The incidence of subsequent need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PMI) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in real world patients with and without pre-existing bradycardia has not yet been fully evaluated.

Methods and Results:A total of 1,131 consecutive patients undergoing first-time RFCA for AF who had no previous or planned device implantation, were enrolled in the present study. Of 799 paroxysmal AF (PAF) patients, 121 (15.1%) had sinus node dysfunction (SND). Of 332 non-PAF patients, 73 (22.0%) had slow ventricular response (VR), defined as heart rate <80 beats/min at rest without any rate-control drugs. The 5-year cumulative incidence of PMI after RFCA in PAF patients with and without SND was 14.8% and 1.7%, respectively (P<0.001). The 5-year cumulative incidence of PMI after RFCA in non-PAF patients with and without slow VR was 14.8% and 4.7%, respectively (P<0.001). SND and female gender in PAF patients, as well as slow VR and age ≥75 years in non-PAF patients, were independent and additive predictors of PMI. The 5-year cumulative incidence of PMI was 26.3% in female PAF patients with SND and 33.3% in elderly non-PAF patients with slow VR.

Conclusions:PMI was avoided in >85% of patients undergoing RFCA for PAF with pre-existing SND, although care should be taken for female patients. Decision-making regarding RFCA for non-PAF patients with slow VR, especially in the elderly, should be cautious.

Content from these authors
© 2018 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
feedback
Top