論文ID: CJ-20-1233
Background: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has the potential to characterize the detailed morphology of calcified coronary plaques. This study examined the prognostic impact of calcified plaque morphology in patients with coronary artery calcification (CAC) who underwent newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.
Methods and Results: In all, 251 patients with moderate to severe CAC who underwent OCT-guided DES implantation were reviewed retrospectively and divided into 3 groups according to OCT findings of the target lesion: 25 patients (10.0%) with calcified nodules (CN), 69 patients (27.5%) with calcified protrusion (CP) without CN, and 157 patients (62.5%) with superficial calcific sheet (SC) without CN and CP. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that, among the 3 groups, the rates of MACE-free survival (log-rank test, P=0.0117), myocardial infarction (log-rank test, P=0.0103), and TLR (log-rank test, P=0.0455) were significantly worse in patients with CN. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that CN was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio 4.41; 95% confidence interval 1.63–10.8; P=0.0047).
Conclusions: Target lesion CN was associated with higher cardiac event rates in patients who underwent newer-generation DES implantation for lesions with moderate to severe CAC.
Drug-eluting stents (DES) achieve superior clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than bare-metal stents (BMS).1 However, coronary artery calcification (CAC) may limit stent delivery and expansion2 and damage the polymer or drug coating, resulting in impaired drug delivery to the vessel wall and restenosis or stent thrombosis, despite the use of a scoring balloon or rotational atherectomy.3–6 A previous study demonstrated that moderate to severe CAC on angiography was strongly associated with stent thrombosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) after DES implantation.7 However, intravascular imaging studies have not clarified how calcified plaque morphology affects the clinical outcomes following DES implantation.
Editorial p ????
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging modality with a maximal spatial resolution of 10 mm, which is 10-fold higher than that of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).8,9 Because near-infrared light from the OCT system can penetrate calcium, OCT provides a more detailed characterization of the morphology of calcified coronary plaques than IVUS.2,4,10 A recent OCT study classified calcified plaques responsible for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) into 3 groups: calcified nodule (CN), calcified protrusion (CP), and superficial calcific sheet (SC).11 CN and CP present a similar protruding calcific mass into the lumen and convex luminal shape, unlike SC. CN often shows an irregular leading edge due to a cluster of small calcific nodules, whereas CP typically shows a smooth leading edge.11 Although it has been reported that these different morphologies of calcified plaque may result in different post-stent OCT findings,12 the effects of the 3 calcified plaque subtypes on long-term clinical outcomes after DES implantation remain unclear.
The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of calcified plaque morphology on cardiovascular events in patients with moderate to severe CAC who underwent OCT-guided DES implantation.
This was a single-center retrospective observational study conducted at Nara Medical University, Japan. In all, 274 patients with moderate to severe CAC in de novo target lesions on fluoroscopy who underwent OCT-guided PCI between January 2014 and December 2016 were enrolled in the study. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed patients who fulfilled the following criteria: (1) implantation with a second- or third-generation DES; (2) OCT performed before stenting; (3) OCT images analyzable; and (4) calcified plaques detected by OCT. Twenty-three lesions were excluded because DES were not used (n=2), baseline OCT images were inadequate (n=2), or there was an absence of target lesion calcification on OCT (n=19). This left 251 patients (283 lesions) with target lesion calcification on OCT who were included and analyzed in this study (Figure 1).
Study flowchart. CN, calcified nodule; CP, calcified protrusion; DES, drug-eluting stent; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SC, superficial calcified sheet.
The diagnosis of ACS included ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina pectoris (UAP). STEMI was defined as continuous chest pain, ST-segment elevation in 2 contiguous leads or new left bundle-branch block on 12-lead electrocardiography, and elevated cardiac marker levels (creatine kinase-MB or troponin). NSTEMI was defined as ischemic symptoms in the absence of ST-segment elevation on the electrocardiogram with elevated cardiac marker levels. UAP was defined as the presence of newly developed or accelerating chest symptoms on exertion or rest angina within 2 weeks of presentation without biomarker release.13
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nara Medical University (Reference no. 1759-2) and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Informed consent was obtained in the form of an opt-out option on the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nara Medical University website.
Diagnostic Coronary Angiography and ProceduresDiagnostic coronary angiography was performed in all patients after intracoronary administration of isosorbide dinitrate (1 mg). The severity of calcification was classified based on the radiopaque densities prior to contrast injection as either moderate (radiopaque densities noted only during the cardiac cycle and typically involving only 1 side of the vascular wall) or severe (radiopaque density noted without cardiac motion and generally involving both sides of the arterial wall).7 PCI was performed using standard techniques and catheters via the femoral or radial approach according to the operator’s or center’s usual practice. All lesions were treated with second- or third-generation DES. After the index PCI, patients were maintained on aspirin (100 mg once daily) and ticlopidine (200 mg twice daily) or clopidogrel (75 mg once daily) for at least 1 year unless they had risk factors for bleeding.
OCT Image AcquisitionOCT imaging was performed using a frequency domain OCT system (C8 System, Dragonfly imaging catheter and ILUMIEN OPTIS; St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) or an optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) system (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). Briefly, the OCT imaging catheter was advanced distal to the target lesion over a conventional 0.014-inch angioplasty guidewire through a 6- or 7-Fr guiding catheter. After intracoronary administration of 1 mg isosorbide dinitrate, pullbacks were performed during continuous injection of X-ray contrast medium or low-molecular-weight dextran containing lactate Ringer’s solution at a rate of 2.5–3.5 mL/s through the guiding catheter using an injection pump to remove blood from the field of view and enable clear visualization of the vessel wall. Images were acquired at a rate of 5 frames/mm and an automated pullback speed of 20 mm/s.14
OCT Image AnalysisOCT images were analyzed by 2 independent observers (S.I. and M.W.) in a blinded manner using a dedicated offline review system (St. Jude Medical). Two observers blinded to each patient’s clinical and lesion characteristics independently performed the OCT measurements. Any discordance between the 2 observers was resolved by consensus with a third reviewer (A.O.).
A baseline OCT examination was performed before the PCI to evaluate the morphology of the calcified plaque within the target lesion. In the case of lesions with severe narrowing precluding passage of the OCT or OFDI catheter or removal of blood from the field for clear visualization of the vessel wall, or lesions with an angiographically visible thrombus, the baseline OCT examination was performed after predilatation using a balloon catheter, rotational atherectomy, or thrombectomy.
The target lesion was defined as the segment that was stented by comparing baseline and post-PCI OCT images. A calcified plaque was defined as a low-signal intensity area with sharply delineated borders.15 Calcified plaques were classified into 3 types: CN, CP, and SC.11 CN was defined as a high-backscattering mass protruding into the lumen with strong signal attenuation and an irregular surface (Figure 2A). CP, also called protruding nodular calcification, was defined as a protruding calcific mass without eruptive nodules (Figure 2B). SC was defined as a non-protruding calcified plaque without CN or CP (Figure 2C,D).11,16 If the target lesion contained CN along with other types of calcified plaque, the calcified plaque was assigned to the CN group. If the target lesion contained CP along with SC, the calcified plaque was assigned to the CP group. The culprit lesions in the first implanted stent were analyzed as target lesions in patients with multivessel PCI.
Representative optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of calcified plaques. (A) A calcified nodule (CN) appears as an expulsion of a cluster of small calcified nodules into the lumen (arrowheads). (B) A calcified protrusion (CP) appears as a protruding calcific mass without small eruptive calcific nodules (arrowheads). (C) A superficial calcific sheet (SC) appears as a sheet-like superficial calcific plate with minimal or no disruption of the overlying fibrous tissue and without erupted nodules or masses protruding into the lumen (arrowheads). (D) Spotty calcification appears as spotty calcium deposits (arrowheads) with length <4 mm and maximal arc <90°. (E) Calculation of the calcium arc; the calcium arc (white line) was 205.2°. (F) Calculation of calcium thickness; the calcium thickness (white line) was 0.78 mm.
Each calcific plaque in the target lesion was quantitatively evaluated according to the following parameters: maximum calcium arc, maximum calcium thickness, and calcium length.17 The maximum calcium arc was determined as the largest calcium arc within the target lesion by visual screening (Figure 2E). Maximum calcium thickness was measured at the thickest calcium segment on the frame with the thickest calcium within the target lesion by visual screening (Figure 2F). When the calcific deposit was thick and the border was not clear due to attenuation, the maximum visible thickness was measured. Calcium length was calculated based on the number of frames with calcified plaques. When ≥2 calcified plaques were present in the target lesion, the plaque with the maximum calcium arc was selected for quantitative analysis.
Minimum lumen area (MLA), minimum stent area (MSA), stent length, mean reference lumen area, stent edge dissection (SED), incomplete stent apposition (ISA), and stent underexpansion were evaluated using post-PCI OCT imaging after the final procedure.18 SED was defined as the disruption of the vessel luminal surface by a visible flap at the stent edge or in reference segments 5 mm proximal and distal to the stent. ISA was defined as separation of the inner surface of a stent strut from the inner vessel wall, in segments without a side branch, by a distance greater than or equal to the axial resolution of OCT plus the width of the stent strut of each stent type, including the polymer coating. When stent struts with ISA were detected, we measured the ISA distance, defined as the distance between the inner surface of the stent strut and the inner surface of the vessel wall. The maximum ISA distance was determined as the longest distance in 3 candidate frames selected by visual screening of all cross-sectional images of a stented segment. Post-PCI mean reference lumen area was defined as the mean of the largest lumen area within 5 mm of the proximal and distal stent edges. The stent expansion ratio was defined as the ratio of MSA to the postprocedural mean reference area.18 Stent underexpansion was defined as a stent expansion ratio <0.8.18
EndpointsThe primary endpoint of the study was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which included cardiac death, myocardial infarction (spontaneous or periprocedural), and TLR. The secondary endpoints were all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, TLR, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Myocardial infarction included periprocedural infarctions, which were defined as an absolute increase in creatinine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) ≥10 times the upper reference limit.19 The indication of TLR/TVR or other PCI was considered for the culprit lesions for ACS or the target lesions ≥50% in diameter stenosis by qualitative coronary angiographic assessment taking into consideration the results of preprocedural myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, exercise electrocardiography, or fractional flow reserve.
All patients were followed-up at Nara Medical University or other primary care institutions every 1–3 months after discharge. Angiographic follow-up was scheduled at 8–12 months after PCI but was performed earlier if there was clinical indication of ischemia. Clinical outcomes were assessed from clinical records at Nara Medical University. All patients were enrolled in the study regardless of the follow-up duration and were censored at the time of death or last known consultation at Nara Medical University.
Statistical AnalysisAll analyses were performed using JMP version 11 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as the mean±SD or median with interquartile range (IQR), whereas categorical variables are presented as counts and percentages. Categorical data were compared using the Pearson χ2 test. Continuous variables were compared using parametric 1-way analysis of variance or the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test based on the variable’s distribution. The cumulative incidence of survival-free periods from clinical events was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In the case of significant differences, pairwise post hoc tests were performed with Bonferroni correction. A univariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare primary and secondary endpoints between patients with and without CN. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of the primary endpoint, which included variables with P<0.05 in the univariate model. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In all, 251 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed in this study. Twenty-five patients (10.0%) were classified into the CN group, 69 (27.5%) were classified into the CP group, and 157 (62.5%) were classified into the SC group (Figure 1).
Table 1 shows a comparison of baseline characteristics among the 3 groups. The prevalence of maintenance dialysis was significantly higher in the CN than other groups. The frequency of statin treatment at discharge was significantly lower in the CN than other groups. There was a significant difference in serum phosphorus levels among the 3 groups.
| CN (n=25) |
CP (n=69) |
SC (n=157) |
P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 70.6±10.7 | 71.9±10.4 | 72.0±9.4 | 0.8092 |
| Male sex | 19 (76.0) | 53 (76.8) | 119 (75.8) | 0.9864 |
| Smoker | 16 (64.0) | 46 (67.7) | 116 (74.8) | 0.3613 |
| Diabetes | 11 (44.0) | 34 (49.3) | 68 (43.3) | 0.7046 |
| Dyslipidemia | 14 (56.0) | 51 (73.9) | 114 (72.6) | 0.1996 |
| Hypertension | 22 (88.0) | 60 (87.0) | 129 (82.2) | 0.5648 |
| Maintenance dialysis | 11 (44.0)*,† | 9 (13.0) | 13 (8.3) | <0.0001 |
| History of MI | 1 (4.0) | 15 (21.7) | 23 (14.7) | 0.0977 |
| History of stroke | 3 (12.0) | 13 (18.8) | 16 (10.2) | 0.1981 |
| Peripheral artery disease | 5 (20.0) | 9 (13.0) | 16 (10.2) | 0.3536 |
| Laboratory data | ||||
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 1.19 [0.70–6.62] | 0.92 [0.77–1.09] | 0.91 [0.74–1.13] | 0.1334 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 36.8 [7.2–72.1] | 59.2 [47.6–71.1] | 60.5 [46.1–75.5]* | 0.0555 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 49.5 [38–59] | 49 [40–58] | 48 [40–58] | 0.9325 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 84 [70–116] | 91 [78–111] | 101 [77–127] | 0.2768 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.7 [5.3–6.7] | 6.2 [5.7–7.0] | 6.1 [5.7–6.8] | 0.3063 |
| Serum corrected Ca (mg/dL) | 8.9 [8.6–9.0] | 8.9 [8.6–9.2] | 8.8 [8.6–9.1] | 0.2296 |
| Serum P (mg/dL) | 3.5 [3.0–5.6] | 3.5 [3.0–3.9] | 3.2 [2.9–3.6] | 0.0465 |
| Medications on admission | ||||
| Insulin | 2 (8.0) | 11 (15.9) | 13 (8.3) | 0.2022 |
| Statin | 11 (44.0) | 36 (52.9) | 72 (46.2) | 0.5962 |
| Vitamin K antagonist | 2 (8.0) | 3 (4.4) | 7 (4.5) | 0.7358 |
| Medications at discharge | ||||
| Aspirin | 25 (100) | 69 (100) | 154 (99.4) | 0.7375 |
| Thienopyridine | 25 (100) | 69 (100) | 153 (98.7) | 0.5426 |
| ACEI/ARB | 16 (64.0) | 58 (84.1) | 119 (76.8) | 0.1129 |
| β-blocker | 14 (56.0) | 35 (50.7) | 91 (58.7) | 0.5386 |
| Statin | 15 (60.0)*,† | 58 (84.1) | 128 (82.6) | 0.0209 |
| Insulin | 1 (4.0) | 11 (15.9) | 17 (11.0) | 0.2557 |
| Oral hypoglycemia agent | 7 (28.0) | 26 (37.7) | 49 (31.6) | 0.5764 |
Unless indicated otherwise, values are presented as the mean±SD, median [interquartile range], or n (%). *P<0.0167 compared with the calcified protrusion (CP) group; †P<0.0167 compared with the superficial calcific sheet (SC) group. ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CN, calcified nodule; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MI, myocardial infarction; P, phosphorus.
Table 2 shows a comparison of lesion and procedural characteristics among the 3 groups. There were significant differences in the frequency of culprit lesions responsible for ACS among the 3 groups. CN was frequently located in the right coronary artery (RCA) and left main trunk. Conversely, CP and SC were frequently located in the left anterior descending artery. The prevalence of severe CAC was significantly higher in the CN and CP groups than in the SC group. The use of rotational atherectomy was significantly more common in the CN group than in the CP and SC groups. Stent diameter was also significantly greater in the CN group. Stent length was significantly larger in the CP than SC group.
| CN (n=28) |
CP (n=76) |
SC (n=179) |
P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical presentation at PCI | 0.2550 | |||
| STEMI | 6 (21.4) | 13 (17.1) | 45 (25.1) | |
| NSTEMI | 1 (3.6) | 3 (4.0) | 17 (9.5) | |
| Unstable angina pectoris | 3 (10.7) | 5 (6.6) | 18 (10.1) | |
| Stable coronary artery disease | 18 (64.3) | 55 (72.4) | 99 (55.3) | |
| Culprit lesion for ACS | 10 (35.7) | 21 (27.6)† | 80 (44.7) | 0.0355 |
| Location of target lesions | 0.0008 | |||
| Right coronary artery | 14 (50.0)*,† | 16 (21.1) | 37 (20.7) | |
| Left anterior descending artery | 10 (35.7) | 55 (72.4) | 123 (68.7) | |
| Left circumflex artery | 1 (3.6) | 3 (4.0) | 16 (8.9) | |
| Left main trunk | 3 (10.7) | 2 (2.6) | 3 (1.7) | |
| Severe calcification | 21 (75.0)† | 38 (50.0)† | 41 (22.9) | <0.0001 |
| Use of rotational atherectomy | 16 (57.1)*,† | 13 (17.1) | 13 (7.3) | <0.0001 |
| Stent diameter (mm) | 3.25 [2.75–3.5]*,† | 2.625 [2.5–3.0] | 2.75 [2.5–3.0] | 0.0008 |
| Stent length (mm) | 33 [18–48] | 33 [27–51]† | 28 [18–42] | 0.0119 |
Unless indicated otherwise, values are presented as the median [interquartile range] or n (%). *P<0.0167 compared with the calcified protrusion (CP) group; †P<0.0167 compared with the superficial calcific sheet (SC) group. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CN, calcified nodule; NSTEMI, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
The OCT findings are summarized in Table 3. Maximum calcium arc, maximum calcium thickness, and calcium length were significantly greater in the CN and CP groups than in the SC group. Calcium length was significantly greater in the CN group than in the CP and SC groups. There were no significant differences in MLA and MSA among the 3 groups, although the reference lumen area was significantly larger in the CN group than in the CP and SC groups. Total stent length was significantly larger in the CP than SC group.
| CN (n=28) |
CP (n=76) |
SC (n=179) |
P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before PCI | ||||
| Maximum calcium arc (°) | 229.5 [177.4–324.4]† | 221.2 [137.9–329.3]† | 161.8 [110.2–261.5] | 0.0007 |
| Maximum calcium thickness (mm) | 1.17±0.30† | 1.10±0.24† | 0.98±0.28 | 0.0001 |
| Calcium length (mm) | 18.3 [11.6–31.2]*,† | 11.6 [6.6–18.4]† | 6.9 [4.6–11.0] | <0.0001 |
| After PCI | ||||
| Minimum lumen area (mm2) | 5.45 [3.61–6.77] | 4.50 [3.31–5.39] | 4.41 [3.54–5.70] | 0.1423 |
| Minimum stent area (mm2) | 5.45 [3.6–6.70] | 4.3 [3.31–5.35] | 4.39 [3.53–5.70] | 0.0732 |
| Reference lumen area (mm2) | 8.17 [6.14–10.3]*,† | 5.77 [4.81–7.16] | 6.21 [5.03–7.92] | 0.0014 |
| Stent expansion ratio | 0.68 [0.57–0.79] | 0.74 [0.64–0.84] | 0.74 [0.64–0.82] | 0.1158 |
| Stent under-expansion | 20 (76.9) | 43 (59.7) | 121 (68.8) | 0.2090 |
| Total stent length (mm) | 34.4 [26.1–45.5] | 33.0 [24.5–44.8]† | 28.0 [19.2–38.0] | 0.0055 |
| Stent edge dissection | 12 (50%)† | 24 (33.8) | 39 (22.9) | 0.0109 |
| Proximal edge dissection | 8 (33.3)† | 14 (19.7) | 21 (12.3) | 0.0204 |
| Distal edge dissection | 4 (16.0) | 11 (15.9) | 22 (12.9) | 0.7957 |
| ISA | 24 (96.0) | 67 (91.8) | 138 (79.3) | 0.0117 |
| Maximum ISA distance (μm) | 530 [340–715]† | 360 [270–560] | 340 [270–490] | 0.0203 |
Unless indicated otherwise, values are presented as the mean±SD, medians [interquartile range], or n (%). *P<0.0167 compared with the CP group; †P<0.0167 compared with the SC group. ISA, incomplete stent apposition. Other abbreviations as in Table 2.
The incidence of SED, ISA, and maximum ISA distance were significantly higher in the CN than SC group.
Clinical follow-up data were obtained for all patients. The median follow-up duration was 728 days (IQR 317–1,032 days). The shortest follow-up duration was 1 day because of death or loss to follow-up after discharge. In-hospital death occurred in 3 patients in the SC group and TLR occurred in 1 patient in the SC group and not in the other groups. There were no significant differences in in-hospital deaths and TLR between the 3 groups (P=0.40 and P=0.74, respectively).
Figure 3 shows the Kaplan-Meier survival curves for clinical outcomes in the 3 groups. MACE-free survival (log rank, P=0.0117), myocardial infarction-free survival (log rank, P=0.0103), and TLR-free survival (log rank, P=0.0455) were significantly worse in the CN group. Conversely, survival, cardiac death-free survival, and TVR-free survival were not statistically different among the 3 groups. On the pairwise post hoc tests, the cumulative incidence of MACE was significantly higher in the CN than CP (P=0.0059) and SC (P=0.0132) groups, and the cumulative incidence of myocardial infarction was significantly higher in the CN than CP group (P=0.0043). There was no significant difference among each of these pairs in the cumulative incidence of TLR.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves of clinical outcomes. (A) Primary endpoint-free survival; (B) all cause death-free survival; (C) cardiac death-free survival; (D) myocardial infarction-free survival, (E) target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free survival, and (F) target vessel revascularization (TVR)-free survival. CN, calcified nodule; CP, calcified protrusion; SC, superficial calcific sheet.
To further clarify the prognostic impact of CN vs. non-CN (CP or SC), we compared patients with and without CN. CN was significantly associated with MACE, myocardial infarction, and TLR (Table 4). Table 5 shows the Cox proportional hazards analysis of predictors of MACE. Univariate analysis indicated that CN, maintenance dialysis, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations were significantly associated with MACE. Multivariate analysis including CN, maintenance dialysis, and serum LDL-C concentrations as covariates (Multivariate Model 1) or including CN, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and serum LDL-C concentrations as covariates (Multivariate Model 2) revealed that CN and serum LDL-C concentrations were independent predictors of MACE.
| Patients with CN (n=25) |
Patients without CN (n=226) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary end point | 7 (28.0) | 20 (8.9) | 3.31 (1.30–7.48) | 0.0146 |
| Secondary end point | ||||
| All cause death | 2 (8.0) | 17 (7.5) | 0.98 (0.15–3.41) | 0.9756 |
| Cardiac death | 1 (4.0) | 5 (2.2) | 1.80 (0.09–11.2) | 0.6170 |
| MI | 3 (12.0) | 4 (1.8) | 6.52 (1.28–29.7) | 0.0264 |
| Spontaneous MI | 2 (8) | 3 (1.3) | 5.96 (0.78–36.1) | 0.0790 |
| Periprocedural MI | 1 (4) | 1 (0.4) | 7.75 (0.30–197) | 0.1797 |
| TLR | 5 (20.0) | 13 (5.8) | 3.41 (1.09–9.05) | 0.0362 |
| TVR | 6 (24.0) | 26 (11.5) | 2.20 (0.82–5.01) | 0.1096 |
Unless indicated otherwise, values are presented as n (%). CI, confidence interval; CN, calcified nodule; HR, hazard ratio; MI, myocardial infarction; TLR, target lesion revascularization; TVR, target vessel revascularization.
| Univariate model | Multivariate model 1 | Multivariate model 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value | |
| CN | 3.31 (1.30–7.48) | 0.0146 | 4.23 (1.53–10.7) | 0.0070 | 4.41 (1.63–10.8) | 0.0047 |
| Age | 0.99 (0.95–1.03) | 0.5718 | ||||
| Male sex | 1.80 (0.69–6.14) | 0.2460 | ||||
| Smoking | 0.94 (0.41–2.41) | 0.8907 | ||||
| Diabetes | 0.97 (0.45–2.08) | 0.9464 | ||||
| Dyslipidemia | 0.61 (0.30–1.32) | 0.2024 | ||||
| Hypertension | 0.81 (0.33–2.42) | 0.6751 | ||||
| Hemodialysis | 2.84 (1.17–6.28) | 0.0225 | 1.94 (0.71–4.78) | 0.1843 | ||
| eGFR | 0.98 (0.97–0.99) | 0.0031 | 0.98 (0.97–1.00) | 0.0808 | ||
| LDL-C | 1.01 (1.00–1.03) | 0.0164 | 1.02 (1.00–1.03) | 0.0060 | 1.02 (1.00–1.03) | 0.0097 |
| Statin at discharge | 0.79 (0.33–2.16) | 0.6145 | ||||
| ACS | 1.50 (0.70–3.22) | 0.2932 | ||||
| Severe calcification | 0.83 (0.34–1.84) | 0.6615 | ||||
| Rotational atherectomy | 2.02 (0.74–4.74) | 0.1570 | ||||
| Maximum calcium arc | 1.00 (0.997–1.01) | 0.4201 | ||||
| Maximum calcium thickness | 1.19 (0.29–4.84) | 0.8132 | ||||
| Calcium length | 1.01 (0.97–1.05) | 0.5356 | ||||
| Minimum stent area | 1.09 (0.87–1.33) | 0.4507 | ||||
| Minimum lumen area | 1.08 (0.87–1.32) | 0.4796 | ||||
| Stent underexpansion | 0.96 (0.43–2.34) | 0.9590 | ||||
| Stent edge dissection | 1.73 (0.75–3.81) | 0.1895 | ||||
Multivariate Model 1 was adjusted for calcified nodule (CN), maintenance hemodialysis, and serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations. Multivariate Model 2 was adjusted for CN, eGFR, and serum LDL-C concentrations. ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR, hazard ratio.
The major findings of this study are that: (1) in target lesions with moderate to severe CAC, the CN, CP, and SC calcified plaque subtypes were present in 9.9%, 26.8%, and 63.3% of patients, respectively; (2) the prevalence of maintenance hemodialysis was significantly higher in the CN than CP and SC groups, and the prevalence of severe CAC was greatest in the CN group, followed by the CP and SC groups; and (3) MACE occurred more frequently in patients with CN than in those with CP or SC, and CN was an independent predictor of MACE.
Recently, Sugiyama et al11 classified calcified plaques responsible for ACS into 3 groups (eruptive CN, CP, and SC) based on OCT findings. These authors reported that the prevalence of CN, CP, and SC was 25.5%, 7.1%, and 67.4%,11 respectively, whereas in the present study of both ACS and stable coronary artery disease the rates were 9.9%, 26.8%, and 63.3%, respectively. Because CN lesions are characteristic of vulnerable plaques prone to ACS, their prevalence in this study was lower than in the study of Sugiyama et al. However, even after excluding patients with stable coronary artery disease from our study population, the prevalence of CN remained lower than that reported previously. This discrepancy may be explained by differences in the study populations.
CN is pathologically defined as the accumulation of small nodular calcifications with disruption of the fibrous cap, and thrombus formation overlying the calcium surface and protruding into the vessel lumen.20,21 CN is recognized as one of the pathogenic mechanisms of ACS.16,20 Lee et al22 reported that CN in PCI culprit lesions was frequently observed in patients on dialysis, in lesions with severe CAC, and in the RCA, especially in the mid or ostial segments. These results are consistent with those of the present study. Although there have been no published reports on pathologically validated CP, CP is recognized as a protruding calcified mass similar to CN on OCT findings.
Newer-generation DES have thinner stent platforms and biocompatible or biodegradable polymers that render these devices less thrombogenic23,24 compared with first-generation DES. However, target lesions with moderate to severe CAC remain independently associated with adverse outcomes in patients treated with newer-generation DES and modern devices.25 Although OCT studies have demonstrated that target lesion calcification limits lumen dilatation by scoring balloon,4 stent expansion during PCI,2 and neointimal coverage at follow-up,26 the association between target lesion CAC and clinical outcome has not been well studied. Shan et al27 reported that there was no significant association between dense calcium volume measured by virtual histology IVUS and TLR or MACE. Conversely, Morofuji et al28 reported that CN by IVUS was significantly associated with MACE, including cardiac death, TLR, and stent thrombosis, in patients with heavily calcified lesions requiring rotational atherectomy. However, IVUS may sometimes confuse CP with CN because of its limited resolution. The present study investigated the effect of calcified plaque morphology on clinical outcomes by distinguishing between CN and CP using OCT imaging. Sugiyama et al reported that there was no significant difference in in-hospital deaths and TLR among CN, CP, and SC.11 The present study also demonstrated no significant difference in in-hospital deaths and TLR among patients with these calcified plaque subtypes, but a significant difference in MACE during long-term follow-up. This was because CN was significantly associated with MACE that occurred in the chronic phase, driven primarily by a higher rate of TLR and myocardial infarction. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to examine the effects of calcified plaque subtypes on MACE during long-term follow-up after DES implantation.
Stent underexpansion is a well-established predictor of stent failure.18,29 Similarly, a previous OCT study reported that MSA was an independent predictor of device-oriented clinical endpoints, including cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, TLR, and stent thrombosis.18 In an OCT study targeting patients with ACS, Kobayashi et al30 reported that MSA was smaller in culprit lesions with than without CN, which was associated with higher TLR in CN lesions. Conversely, in the present study, TLR occurred more frequently in patients with CN despite the greater MSA than in those without CN. In addition, SED, ISA, and stent underexpansion are considered as causes of in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis.3,31,32 A recent OCT study reported that CN was associated with a higher incidence of SED and ISA,12 which is consistent with the present study. To clarify the association between post-stent OCT findings and MACE, we compared patients with and without MACE in each calcified plaque subgroup. There was no significant difference in MSA and the incidence of SED, stent underexpansion, and ISA in each calcified plaque subtype (Supplementary Table). Although the mechanism of TLR in lesions with CN has not been clearly identified, some possible causes can be suggested. Previous studies had indicated that CN was associated with breaks in the calcified sheet and was predominantly located at the mid-RCA, where coronary torsion stress is greater as a result of “hinge motion”.20,22 This mechanical stress may cause stent fracture, which is related to subsequent stent failure.33 Furthermore, a previous human autopsy study suggested a novel mechanism of stent failure caused by CN from 2 cases where CN protruded into the lumen after stent implantation.34 Therefore, these phenomena after DES implantation, rather than procedural factors such as MSA, stent underexpansion, SED, or ISA, may be related to subsequent stent failure in lesions with CN.
As shown in the present study, calcified lesions with CN are considered high-risk lesions, even in the era of newer-generation DES. Therefore, alternative strategies to improve the outcome of these high-risk lesions are needed. A recent study reported that TLR rates after drug-coated balloon angioplasty following rotational atherectomy for heavily calcified lesions was comparable to that of newer-generation DES.35 Therefore, if appropriate lesion preparation with rotational atherectomy is achieved in heavily calcified lesions with CN, a “stentless” strategy using drug-coated balloons could be an alternative treatment choice. Furthermore, considering the inferior outcomes of target lesions with CN, detection of CNs in multivessel heavily calcified lesions may encourage the referral of patients for coronary artery bypass grafting rather than performing multiple PCI procedures.
Study LimitationsSeveral limitations of this study should be noted. First, this was a single-center retrospective observational study. Second, because individual physicians determined both the treatment strategy and OCT procedure, potential selection bias could not be avoided. At Nara Medical University, OCT-guided PCI is generally avoided in patients with severe renal function not on dialysis and in those with an unstable condition, such as cardiogenic shock or congestive heart failure. Third, OCT assessments after predilatation using a balloon catheter, rotational atherectomy, or thrombectomy were performed in 28.3% of cases with severe narrowing not amenable to OCT or OFDI catheter passage or removal of blood from the field of view, which may have affected visualization of the calcified plaque. Fourth, OCT may not fully visualize the deep calcium in the setting of superficial plaque attenuation due to its limited depth of penetration. In addition, strong attenuation due to a lipid-rich component within or adjacent to the calcified area36 or a thick calcification may make the outer border of the calcification unclear or invisible, resulting in underestimation of the calcium detected by OCT. Fifth, although several studies demonstrated that patients on dialysis had an increased risk of target lesion failure and cardiovascular events after DES implantation,37,38 in the present study dialysis was not significantly associated with MACE in the multivariate analysis. It is speculated that this is because dialysis is a strong predictor of CN. Sixth, the sample size of the present present study was relatively small. A large-scale prospective cohort study is needed to investigate the characteristics of CN, which has the greatest effect on future clinical outcomes, and the optimal PCI strategy for calcified lesions with CN.
Target lesion CN was associated with more frequent cardiac events in patients who underwent OCT-guided DES implantation for lesions with moderate to severe CAC.
The authors thank the staff of the catheterization laboratory at Nara Medical University for their excellent assistance.
This study did not receive any specific funding.
Y.S. is a member of Circulation Journal’s Editorial Team. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nara Medical University (Reference no. 1759-2).
The deidentified participant data will not be shared.
Please find supplementary file(s);
http://dx.doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1233
