Endocrine Journal
Online ISSN : 1348-4540
Print ISSN : 0918-8959
ISSN-L : 0918-8959
ORIGINALS
Diagnosis and surgical indications of oxyphilic follicular tumors in Japan: Surgical specimens and cytology
Yasuhiro ItoMitsuyoshi HirokawaAkira MiyauchiMinoru KiharaTomonori YabutaHiroo MasuokaMitsuhiro FukushimaTakuya HigashiyamaKaoru KobayashiAkihiro Miya
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2016 Volume 63 Issue 11 Pages 977-982

Details
Abstract

Oxyphilic cell carcinoma is a relatively rare type of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. We investigated the diagnosis of oxyphilic cell carcinoma based on surgical specimens and cytology to elucidate the indications for surgery for oxyphilic tumors. Among 330 patients pathologically diagnosed as having an oxyphilic cell carcinoma or adenoma, the incidence of carcinoma was 21%. The pathological diagnosis of oxyphilic cell carcinoma was related to tumor size (>4 cm). On cytology, 79% of the tumors were classified as category IV or greater by the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC), but no significant difference was established between category IV or greater and categories I-III regarding the incidence of carcinoma. Of 998 patients cytologically diagnosed as having oxyphilic cell tumors (BSRTC category IV), 426 underwent surgery and 66 (15%) were diagnosed as malignancies. In a univariate analysis, serum thyroglobulin (Tg) levels (>500 ng/dL) for anti-Tg antibody-negative patients, tumor size (>4 cm) and US class (≥3) significantly predicted malignant histology. A multivariate logistic analysis revealed that US finding was an independent predictor of malignant histology, and tumor size (>4 cm) also predicted malignancy when the Tg level was excluded from the variables. These findings suggest that, for thyroid tumors diagnosed as oxyphilic follicular neoplasms on cytology, surgical indications are tumors with US class ≥3, tumor size >4 cm, and Tg >500 ng/dL (with negative Tg-antibody). It is not appropriate to perform surgery for all cases for a precise histological classification, unlike the BSRTC recommendation.

Content from these authors
© The Japan Endocrine Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top