Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. Japanese Journal of Geriatrics
Print ISSN : 0300-9173
Original Articles
Clinicians' opinions on receiving the advance directives of terminal-stage patients vary according to the age of respondents
Ken-ichi AritaYasuhiko Ikegami
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2012 Volume 49 Issue 3 Pages 318-324

Details
Abstract

Aim and methods: We distributed 282 questionnaires to doctors to ascertain their opinions on obtaining the advance directives regarding the end-of-life treatment of patients at the terminal stage. We received 136 (48%) responses.
Results: A total of 62% of the respondents stated a desire for patients to indicate their advance directives "if at all possible". Only 36% stated that the need for advance directives "depended on the circumstances". A total of 80% of doctors aged under 40 wished patients to provide advanced directives "if at all possible", while 59% of doctors over 61 wanted advanced directives "depending on the circumstances" (p=0.008). A large number of doctors stated a desire for patients to indicate their preference in writing, particularly directives regarding the "use of a ventilator to prolong life" (76%) or the "use of artificial nourishment through a gastric fistula etc. as part of a proactive approach to sustaining life" (67%). Regarding the optimal timing of this declaration, 59% chose "at the first diagnosis of a terminal illness", and 47% chose "at the diagnosis of a chronic illness", regardless of whether it could become terminal. Of those respondents under 40, 32% believed that doctors should strictly follow the patients' advance directives, while only 11% of doctors over 61 years old believed the same. There was a statistically significant relationship between aging and dealing with advance directives of patients in the terminal stages of illness (p=0.002).
Conclusion: These results suggest that doctors under 40 years of age should focus on how to correctly interpret the wishes of the patients expressed in the directives, while doctors over 61 should concentrate on the importance of the clinical application of advance directives, and how to balance the need to make qualified medical decisions on treatment in compliance with the wishes of end-stage terminal patients.

Content from these authors
© 2012 The Japan Geriatrics Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top