Internal Medicine
Online ISSN : 1349-7235
Print ISSN : 0918-2918
ISSN-L : 0918-2918

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Predictive Value of the PaO2/FIO2 Ratio for Mortality in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Satoshi YoshimuraKatsuhiko HashimotoYuji ShonoTakahiro TamuraRyo UchimidoKoichi AndoSatoshi OkamoriTakuo YoshidaShigenori YoshitakeYohei Okadaon behalf of the Japanese ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline Systematic Review Task Force
著者情報
ジャーナル オープンアクセス 早期公開

論文ID: 4292-24

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Background Despite the controversy regarding its clinical utility, the PaO2/FIO2 ratio has been used to define the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) details summary estimates of the predictive performance of PaO2/FIO2 ratio in predicting mortality in patients with ARDS.

Methods To clarify the integrated diagnostic accuracy, we included studies in which the study population comprised patients with ARDS in any clinical setting, included adult patients (≥18 years old), and evaluated mortality. The MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials databases were searched for articles in English. We performed SRMA on the accuracy of the diagnostic prognostic tests using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool to evaluate the risk of bias. We obtained summary point estimates of sensitivity and specificity and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic curve with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results Twenty-eight trials with 38270 patients were included in the quality assessment. Most of the studies were conducted in intensive-care units. Overall, the risk of bias is high. For PaO2/FIO2 of 100 and 200 the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC were 44.8% (95% CI, 38.1%-51.7%), 70.6% (95% CI, 65.9%-74.9%), 0.60 (0.58-0.64) and 83.9% (95% CI, 78.9%-87.8%), 26.1% (95% CI, 20.8%-32.1%), 0.64 (0.60-0.69), respectively.

Conclusion The PaO2/FIO2 ratio alone did not have impressive prediction accuracy for mortality in patients with ARDS and might not be able to be used solely as a clinical prognostic tool.

著者関連情報
© 2025 by The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
feedback
Top