Abstract
Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) has been in focus as a new
analytical method that overcomes the problems of conventional quantitative
and qualitative research and bridges the gap between them. In recent years,
the number of studies that apply QCA in the field of administrative science
has rapidly increased. This study aims to deepen readers’ understanding of
QCA and its potential applications in future research. We first present the
challenges of conventional quantitative and qualitative research methods
and a comparative overview of the characteristics and challenges of QCA.
We then discuss the applications of QCA to administrative science, focusing
on QCA attributes that facilitate the analysis of phenomena characterized by
causal asymmetry, conjunction, and equifinality. Furthermore, with reference
to previous studies, including seminal works such as Hertzberg’s motivationhygiene
theory and Fiedler’s contingency theory of leadership, we examine how
QCA is suitable for administrative science. Subsequently, we demonstrate the
usefulness of QCA in administrative science research and the possible direction
of its future application.
