アクセス権・政策参画・当事者
キーワード:
アクセス権から政策参画へ,
《当事者参画》の妥当性,
《実践当事者》と「観察者の特権」,
実践当事者と、社会科学における<実証>,
地方自治レベルにおける市民・住民参画の意義{当事者参画,
行政権力・政治権力の肥大化}
2004 年 40 巻 2 号 p. 102-114
詳細
2004 年 40 巻 2 号 p. 102-114
The term 'right of access' essentially has two sides of implication. One is 'disclosure of information,' and the other is 'right of access to press.' The former has been given concrete shape. But, in Japan, the latter has not been legislated. Japanese courts have not admitted the latter side embodied by the governmental authority. The concept 'right of access' should be expanded into 'policy participation,' I insist. Because the stance 'access' has largely aimed to influence the public policy making. And it may be appropriate that <<actors concerned>> have <<right of policy participation>>. For they know the issue under consideration better than any other <observers>. (Of course, communication among actors concerned, citizens and authorities is indispensable.) At the foot of the paper, I suggest the systematization of <<policy participation of actors concerned>>.
