Journal of Epidemiology
Online ISSN : 1349-9092
Print ISSN : 0917-5040
ISSN-L : 0917-5040

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Marital Status, Education, and Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Mainland China: The INTER-HEART Study
Bo HuWei LiXingyu WangLisheng LiuKoon TeoSalim Yusuf
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS Advance online publication

Article ID: JE20100175

Details
Abstract

Background: We investigated the effects of marital status and education on the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a large-scale case-control study in China.
Methods: This study was part of the INTER-HEART China case-control study. The main outcome measure was first AMI. Incident cases of AMI and control patients with no past history of heart disease were recruited. Controls were matching by age (±5 years) and sex. Marital status was combined into 2 categories: single and not single. Education level was classified into 2 categories: 8 years or less and more than 8 years.
Results: From 1999 to 2002, we recruited 2909 cases and 2947 controls from 17 cities. After adjustment for age, sex, BMI, psychosocial factors, lifestyle, other factors, and mutually for other risk factors, the odds ratio (OR) for AMI associated with being single was 1.51 (95% confidence interval: 1.18–1.93) overall, 1.19 (0.84–1.68; P = 0.072) in men and 2.00 (1.39–2.86; P < 0.0001) in women. The interaction of sex and marital status was statistically significant (P = 0.045). Compared with a high education level, a low education level increased the risk of AMI (1.45, 1.26–1.67); the odds ratios in men and women were 1.29 (1.09–1.52) and 1.55 (1.16–2.08), respectively. Single women with a low education level had a high risk of AMI (2.95, 1.99–4.37).
Conclusions: Being single was consistently associated with an increased risk for AMI, particularly in women. In addition, as compared with high education level, low education level was associated with a higher risk of AMI in both men and women.

Content from these authors
© 2012 by the Japan Epidemiological Association
feedback
Top