Japanese Journal of Health Physics
Online ISSN : 1884-7560
Print ISSN : 0367-6110
ISSN-L : 0367-6110
Review
How Can Interventions for Inhabitants Be Justified after a Nuclear Accident?
―An Approach Based on the Radiological Protection System of the International Commission on Radiological Protection―
Shogo TAKAHARAToshimitsu HOMMAMinoru YONEDAYoko SHIMADA
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2016 Volume 51 Issue 3 Pages 147-159

Details
Abstract

Management of radiation-induced risks in areas contaminated by a nuclear accident is characterized by three ethical issues: (i) risk trade-off, (ii) paternalistic intervention and (iii) individualization of responsibilities. To deal with these issues and to clarify requirements of justification of interventions for the purpose of reduction in radiation-induced risks, we explored the ethical basis of the radiological protection system of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The ICRP's radiological protection system is established based on three normative ethics, i.e. utilitarianism, deontology and virtue ethics. The three ethical issues can be resolved based on the decision-making framework which is constructed in combination with these ethical theories. In addition, the interventions for inhabitants have the possibility to be justified in accordance with two ways. Firstly, when the dangers are severe and far-reaching, interventions could be justified with a sufficient explanation about the nature of harmful effects (or beneficial consequences). Secondly, if autonomy of intervened-individuals can be promoted, those interventions could be justified.

Content from these authors
© 2016 Japan Health Physics Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top