Nihon Nyugan Kenshin Gakkaishi (Journal of Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening)
Online ISSN : 1882-6873
Print ISSN : 0918-0729
ISSN-L : 0918-0729
Original Articles
Mammographic Density Affects Breast Cancer Screening Quality
Naoko Takeda Hiromi FuchikamiYuko InoueKazuhiko Sato
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2018 Volume 27 Issue 2 Pages 173-177

Details
Abstract

The identification of a mass on mammography(MMG)is difficult if the breast is dense. MMG density can be classified into dense(heterogenous and extremely dense tissue)and non- dense(fatty and scattered fibroglandular tissue). We compared the demographic data and quality of breast cancer screening among subjects who underwent MMG screening between January 2015and October2016as well as the false-positive rates among subjects without breast cancer. During this period, 134 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, which was intended for 1036 patients without breast cancer. Subjects with or without breast cancer were examined and classified into non-dense and dense groups. Among the patients who underwent surgery, 46 and 88 patients had non-dense and dense breasts, respectively. The median age of the patients was 65 years(range, 36-91 years)and 53 years(range, 37-76 years)in the dense and non-dense groups, respectively(P <0.05). The median diameter of the mass was 15 mm in both groups(n.s.). Seventy-six(84.4%)and 44 patients(95.7%)in the dense and non-dense groups, respectively, had greater than category 3 lesions. Other MMG findings for breast cancer were also investigated, and architectural distortion was prominent in the dense group, whereas masses were more clearly visualized in the non-dense group. The false-positive rate in the dense group(89 cases, 12.2%)was higher than that in the non-dense group(17cases,5.6%). These findings suggest that dense breast tissue lowers the sensitivity and specificity of MMG screening, and special attention should be given to architectural distortions among patients with dense breasts.

Content from these authors
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top