教育心理学研究
Online ISSN : 2186-3075
Print ISSN : 0021-5015
ISSN-L : 0021-5015
4枚カード問題における推論ストラテジー選択に及ぼす問題型式の効果
工藤 与志文
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

1991 年 39 巻 2 号 p. 143-152

詳細
抄録

It is generally recognized that people tends to select more confirmative strategy (seaching for confirming evidences) than falsificative strategy (searching for falsifying evidences) in hypothesis-testing. Such tendency is also assumed to explain the difficulty of the four-card problem (FCP) because hypothesis-testing is explicit in an ordinary FCP problem-type. Therefore problem-type in which hypothesis-testing is implicit will facilitate a selection of falsificative strategy. In a present study two FCP problem-types were set to undergraduates: a proposition-testing type and an example-testing type. The main results were as follows: (1) in the example-testing type, falsificative strategy was selected most; and no confirmative strategy was seen; (2) the problem-types had no effect in the arbitrary propositions (having the arbitrary connection between the antecedent and consequent); and (3) selection of falsificative strategy in the example-testing type was seen essential to its selection in the proposition-testing type. These results suggested that it was premature to deny thematic material effect in FCP, and responses to FCP could be interpreted by the Vygotsky's zone of proximal development.

著者関連情報
© 日本教育心理学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top