Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology
Online ISSN : 1881-4883
Print ISSN : 0369-4305
ISSN-L : 0369-4305
Data
Nationwide Survey of Medical Radiation Exposure on Cardiovascular Examinations in Japan
Tooru IshibashiYasutaka TakeiHajime SakamotoYukari YamashitaMamoru KatoAtsuko TsukamotoKazuma MatsumotoHiroshi MizutaniShoichi SuzukiYoh KatohKoichi Chida
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2020 Volume 76 Issue 1 Pages 64-71

Details
Abstract

Purpose: It is very important to manage the radiation dose of cardiovascular interventional (CVI) procedures. Overseas, the diagnostic reference levels for cardiac interventional procedures were established with the air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r) and the air kerma-area product (PKA). Although the Japan DRLs 2015 was established by the Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposure (J-RIME), the Japan DRL for CVIs were established by fluoroscopic dose rates of 20 mGy/min at the patient entrance reference point with 20 cm thickness polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom. In the present our study, we performed a questionnaire survey of indicated values of angiographic parameters in CVI procedures. Methods: A nationwide questionnaire was sent by post to 765 facilities. Question focused on angiographic technology, exposure parameters and radiation doses as the displayed dosimetric parameters on the angiographic machine. Results: The recovery rate was 22.8% at 175 out of 765 facilities. In total 1728 cases of the coronary angiography (CAG), 1703 cases of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 962 cases of the radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and 377 cases of pediatric CVI. The 75th percentile value of Ka,r, PKA, fluoroscopy time (FT) and number of cine images (CI) for CAG, PCI, RFCA and pediatric CVI were 702, 2042, 644, and 159 mGy, respectively, 59.3, 152, 81.3, and 14.9 Gy・cm2, respectively, 10.2, 35.6, 61.1, and 35.6 min, respectively and 1503, 2672, 722, and 2378 images, respectively. Our investigation showed that the angiographic parameters were different in several CVI procedures. Conclusions: The displayed dosimetric parameters on the angiographic machine in CVI procedures showed different values. We should classify the dosimetric parameters for each procedure.

Content from these authors
© 2020 Japanese Society of Radiological Technology
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top