2026 Volume 20 Issue 1 Article ID: ra.2025-0131
Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is among the most common neurosurgical conditions, particularly affecting older adults and patients receiving anticoagulation. While burr-hole evacuation has long been the standard therapy, recurrence rates and associated morbidity remain significant. Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization has recently emerged as a promising alternative or adjunctive treatment, offering durable hematoma control with reduced recurrence. To understand the rationale and safety of this endovascular approach, detailed knowledge of MMA anatomy, embryology, and variations is essential. This review synthesizes current understanding of the MMA from gross and microvascular perspectives, integrating embryological origins, common and rare anatomical variants, and dural angioarchitecture, with emphasis on how these factors inform embolization strategies for cSDH. By bridging historical anatomical insights with contemporary angiographic and clinical evidence, we aim to provide a comprehensive resource for clinicians and researchers involved in neuroendovascular therapy.
Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a progressive accumulation of blood and inflammatory fluid in the subdural space, affecting predominantly older adults and patients with coagulopathies or receiving antithrombotic therapy. Traditional management with burr-hole evacuation achieves hematoma decompression but is associated with recurrence rates of up to 20% in some series.1) In recent years, middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization has gained attention as an alternative or adjunctive treatment, with multiple studies demonstrating reduced recurrence rates and favorable safety profiles.2–4) The underlying rationale is to target the vascular supply to the fragile neocapillary networks within the cSDH membranes, thereby interrupting the cycle of rebleeding and exudation.5)
The success and safety of MMA embolization depend on detailed anatomical knowledge. While the MMA is the principal dural artery supplying the cranial convexity, it demonstrates considerable embryological complexity, anatomical variability, and extensive anastomotic connections.6) Understanding these features is not merely academic—it is critical for avoiding complications such as cranial nerve palsies or inadvertent embolization of ophthalmic or cerebral arteries.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the MMA in the context of cSDH embolization. We first trace the embryologic origins of the vessel, then describe its normal and variant anatomy, followed by the microvascular dural angioarchitecture. Finally, we discuss how these insights directly inform the practice of MMA embolization for cSDH.
The MMA originates from one of the most fascinating processes in cranial vascular embryology: the development and regression of the stapedial artery system. During early embryogenesis, the stapedial artery emerges from the hyoid artery—a remnant of the 2nd aortic arch—and traverses the stapes ring within the middle ear cavity. This transient but critical vessel contributes to the formation of the definitive cranial arterial network. It divides into 2 main branches: supraorbital (intracranial superior division) and maxillomandibular (extracranial inferior division). The ventral pharyngeal artery originates from the remnant vascular network of the ventral part of the 2nd aortic arch and merges with the maxillomandibular branch, finally forming the external carotid artery (ECA) with regression of the stapedial artery. The proximal part of the maxillomandibular branch forms the main trunk of the MMA, which passes through the foramen spinosum and anastomoses with the dorsal branch of the supraorbital branch. After this anastomosis, the MMA is supplied by the ECA via the internal maxillary artery. The supraorbital branch connects to the future ophthalmic artery. Through this process, the stapedial artery serves as a bridge between the internal and external carotid circulations.6–8)
As the embryo develops, the proximal portion of the stapedial artery typically regresses, leaving behind its distal cranial segments. These distal remnants are incorporated into the developing maxillary artery, which arises as a branch of the ECA. The remnant incorporated into the maxillary system ultimately becomes the trunk of the MMA. This transition from an internal carotid-based supply (via the stapedial artery) to an external carotid origin exemplifies how embryological vessel regression and persistence shape adult anatomy.8)
Persistence and regressionAberrations in this developmental sequence explain many clinically significant variations of the MMA. If the proximal stapedial artery fails to regress, a persistent stapedial artery may remain in continuity with the internal carotid artery (ICA), producing unusual origins of the MMA from the petrous or cavernous segment of the ICA. Similarly, incomplete incorporation by the maxillary artery can result in the MMA arising from the ophthalmic artery. Other rare variations, such as origin from the basilar artery, reflect persistence of primitive anastomotic channels between the primitive trigeminal artery and stapedial branches.9)
In most individuals, the MMA arises from the 1st segment of the maxillary artery, a terminal branch of the ECA. It ascends through the infratemporal fossa, passing posterior to the lateral pterygoid muscle, and enters the cranial cavity via the foramen spinosum, which is typically present and patent bilaterally. Once within the middle cranial fossa, the artery courses laterally across the greater wing of the sphenoid bone before dividing into its principal anterior and posterior branches.10,11)
SegmentationDetailed angiographic studies have classified the MMA into several distinct segments, each with characteristic branching patterns and relationships to surrounding bone and dura matter11) (Fig. 1A and 1B):

br, branches; FS, foramen spinosum
This segmentation framework is particularly useful in endovascular planning, as each segment carries distinct anastomotic risks and opportunities for embolization.
Major branches and anastomosesThe MMA has several clinically important branches:



MMA, middle meningeal artery
These anastomoses highlight the importance of selective angiography and precise microcatheter positioning during embolization.
Territory suppliedThe MMA supplies the majority of the supratentorial dura, including the lateral convexities, falx cerebri, tentorial insertions, and calvarial bone via transosseous branches. This extensive distribution explains why MMA embolization can effectively devascularize the membranes of cSDH, which rely heavily on MMA supply for their pathological neovasculature.5,6,13)
Although the classic origin of the MMA is from the maxillary artery, several important anatomical variations have been reported. The most clinically relevant of these originates from the ophthalmic artery (Fig. 5). An ophthalmic-origin MMA is relatively uncommon, reported in 0.5%–2% of angiographic series.14) Embolization from such ophthalmic-rigin MMA presents a high risk of vision loss if embolic material enters the central retinal artery. Three main types of this variation have been described.15) The 1st type involves the entire MMA territory being supplied by the ophthalmic artery through the recurrent meningeal artery. In the 2nd type, only the anterior branch of the MMA originates from the ophthalmic artery, while the posterior branch retains its origin from the internal maxillary artery. The 3rd type is not a true ophthalmic origin of the MMA but rather an anastomosis between the ophthalmic artery and the accessory meningeal artery (via the deep recurrent ophthalmic artery). As a result, the anterior meningeal territory is supplied by both the MMA and the ophthalmic artery without direct communication between them.

MMA, middle meningeal artery
Origins from the cavernous or petrous ICA are rarer and are often associated with persistence of embryonic stapedial artery remnants14) (Fig. 6). The MMA may also arise from the cervical segment of the ICA, ascend along the cervical ICA, enter the tympanic cavity through the inferior tympanic canaliculus, and then follow the typical course of the stapedial artery. In this variant, annexation of the stapedial artery by the inferior tympanic artery (a branch of the ascending pharyngeal artery), along with regression of the proximal stapedial artery, explains this vascular configuration.

Rare cases describe the MMA arising from the basilar artery, usually between the anterior inferior cerebellar artery and the superior cerebellar artery.16,17) This reflects persistence of trigeminal–basilar connections (the trigeminostapedial variant).9) Recognition of these variants requires meticulous angiography of both the external and internal carotid circulations.
Variations in course and foraminaIn some cases, the MMA does not traverse the foramen spinosum.18,19) The absence of the foramen spinosum on imaging often indicates a variant origin. These variants can complicate catheter navigation and may alter the embolization target territory. In an analysis of 140 MMAs,20) dominance of the anterior branch was observed in 41%. The posterior convexity branch originated proximally (at or near the foramen spinosum) in 36% of cases, at an intermediate point in 44%, and distally in 21%. In cases where the posterior convexity branch originates proximally, particular care is required to avoid inadvertent migration into the petrosal branch during microcatheter navigation toward the posterior convexity branch.
Embryological basis and clinical significanceAll these variations are best understood in the context of embryology. Persistence of stapedial connections explains ophthalmic and ICA origins. Orbital branches of the MMA also represent potentially hazardous anastomoses. Reflux of embolic agents into the ophthalmic artery has long been considered a potential risk during MMA embolization. These dangerous anastomoses between the MMA and the ophthalmic artery arise from their embryological relationship.8) Clinically, knowledge of these variants is crucial for patient safety: failure to identify an ophthalmic origin can result in catastrophic vision loss, while unrecognized ICA connections may lead to cerebral infarction.
The cranial dura mater is not a uniform sheet but a complex structure composed of distinct histological layers. Classically, 3 components are recognized5,21):
This layered organization is central to understanding why certain vascular compartments are targeted during embolization.
Outer arterial networkThe outer periosteal network is characterized by relatively large-caliber vessels, typically 100–300 μm in diameter.22) These arteries, derived from MMA branches, demonstrate extensive anastomoses across sutures and through the diploë of the calvarium. Key features include:5,6)
These pathways explain why angiography often shows bilateral or transosseous supply to cSDH membranes. Therapeutically, they may justify bilateral MMA embolization even in unilateral cSDH, as contralateral feeders can sustain vascularization.23) However, the potential benefits of bilateral embolization require further investigation in future studies.
Transitional penetrating vesselsFrom the outer network, penetrating arterioles pass through the relatively avascular meningeal layer into the border cell layer.24) These vessels, ranging from 30–80 μm, represent a crucial link between larger convexity arteries and the fragile inner plexus. They are prone to pathological remodeling, becoming tortuous and leaky in disease states. The fact that these transitional vessels are supplied by proximal MMA branches underscores why selective embolization of distal convexity branches can effectively deprive hematoma membranes of their vascular supply.
Inner capillary plexusThe innermost border cell layer contains a delicate capillary plexus approximately 5–15 μm in diameter. This plexus is normally sparse, but in conditions such as cSDH, it undergoes significant angiogenesis. The vessels are immature, with thin walls lacking tight junctions, making them prone to leakage of both plasma and erythrocytes. Inflammatory mediators—including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukins, and matrix metalloproteinases—further destabilize these vessels, perpetuating a cycle of exudation and microhemorrhage.24,25)
Histopathological studies consistently demonstrate hemosiderin-laden macrophages, fibrin breakdown products, and ongoing microvascular leakage within this layer. This pathological vascular bed, supplied by MMA arterioles, represents the therapeutic target of embolization.
Angiographic correlatesThe microvascular architecture of the dura appears on angiography5) as:
Successful embolization typically results in the disappearance or attenuation of this blush, correlating with subsequent hematoma involution.26)
Clinical significanceThe layered and interconnected nature of dural vasculature has several important implications:
The earliest descriptions of cSDH in the 19th century emphasized a traumatic origin, often attributing the condition to rupture of cortical bridging veins following minor head trauma. This explanation persisted for decades, supported by observations of older adults with brain atrophy, in whom veins appeared stretched and more susceptible to tearing. Rowbotham and Little advanced this venous rupture hypothesis, suggesting that small tears permitted the slow accumulation of blood in the subdural space.27)
However, surgical and histopathological evidence over the past 5 decades has challenged this view. Many patients with cSDH have no clear history of trauma, and intraoperative exploration rarely reveals torn veins. Instead, surgeons consistently observe thickened, vascularized outer membranes lining the hematoma cavity. These membranes contain proliferating capillaries, hemosiderin deposits, inflammatory cells, and evidence of repeated microhemorrhages.28,29) Such findings indicate that the hematoma is not a static collection but a biologically active lesion sustained by ongoing vascular processes rather than a single traumatic event.
The cycle of membrane vascularizationModern understanding posits that cSDH represents a self-perpetuating cycle of inflammation, neovascularization, and rebleeding.28,29) Initial trauma or subdural effusion may trigger proliferation of dural border cells, with subsequent angiogenesis driven by VEGF and other cytokines. The newly formed vessels are immature, thin-walled, and permeable.30) They leak plasma and red blood cells, generating further mass effect and inflammation. Fibrin degradation products within the hematoma cavity further stimulate angiogenesis, sustaining this pathological cycle.24)
The MMA plays a pivotal role in this process. As the principal arterial supply to the outer dural membrane, it delivers blood to these fragile neocapillaries. Histological studies demonstrate direct continuity between MMA arterioles and the capillary plexus of the outer hematoma membrane.27) Embolization of the MMA interrupts this vascular input, thereby disrupting the cycle of hemorrhage and exudation.
Hemodynamic considerationsThe dural vascular network exhibits low-resistance flow. In the presence of cSDH, angiography demonstrates hypertrophied MMA branches with persistent blush corresponding to the vascularized outer membrane. Embolization reduces or eliminates this blush, which correlates with gradual hematoma volume reduction over time.5,26) Importantly, the inner hematoma membrane—which interfaces with the brain surface—is less vascularized and is not primarily supplied by the MMA.5) This distinction explains why embolization targets the outer membrane, leading to gradual resorption of the hematoma rather than immediate decompression.
Imaging evidence of pathophysiologyModern angiographic and cross-sectional imaging corroborate these pathophysiological insights. On DSA, cSDH membranes appear as diffuse dural staining fed by convexity branches of the MMA.5) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and flat-panel CT can show enhancement of the outer membrane, reflecting active vascular proliferation.26) These imaging findings strengthen the rationale for embolization by demonstrating that the hematoma is sustained by ongoing MMA-dependent perfusion.
Clinical–pathological correlationClinically, patients undergoing MMA embolization exhibit significantly lower recurrence rates compared to those treated with conventional burr-hole drainage alone. This outcome aligns with the proposed mechanism: surgical evacuation removes the hematoma mass but does not address the vascular source, whereas embolization deprives the membrane of its arterial supply, leading to involution. In refractory cases, embolization performed after surgery reduces the likelihood of reaccumulation.31) Thus, the pathophysiological basis for MMA embolization is supported not only by theory but also by clinical outcomes.
The MMA develops embryologically from the stapedial artery, which originates from the hyoid artery, it maintains numerous potential connections with both the ophthalmic artery and the ICA in adulthood. In addition, the MMA supplies a wide territory extending from the cranial vault to the skull base; therefore, a detailed understanding of its collateral pathways is crucial for MMA embolization (Fig. 7).

AphA, ascending pharyngeal artery; br, branches; CTA, caroticotympanic artery; FS, foramen spinosum; ICA, internal carotid artery; ILT, inferolateral trunk; IMA, internal maxillary artery; MLF, meningolacrimal foramen; MMA, middle meningeal artery; OcciA, occipital artery; SOF, superior orbital fissure
In the orbital region, the anterior branch of the MMA forms clinically significant anastomoses with the lacrimal branch of the ophthalmic artery. Anatomical studies have demonstrated the presence of orbital branches of the MMA in approximately 64.9% of individuals.32) The routes by which the MMA enters the orbit include: menigolacrimal foramen (meningolacrimal artery): 43.2%, superior orbital fissure (via the recurrent meningeal artery or sphenoidal artery): 16.2%.
The anterior branch of the MMA courses along the anterior margin of the greater wing of the sphenoid bone and may anastomose with branches of the inferolateral trunk (ILT) or the meningohypophyseal trunk (MHT). Through the recurrent meningeal artery, it also connects to the tentorial artery.
Because these anastomoses lead directly to the ophthalmic circulation, any reflux of embolic material during MMA embolization carries a risk of retinal ischemia and vision loss.
Cavernous regionThe ILT of the ICA plays a central role in the anastomotic network around the cavernous sinus. According to Lasjaunias et al., the ILT typically divides into anterior, posterior, and superior branches.33) The marginal tentorial artery usually arises from the meningohypophyseal trunk, but may arise from the ILT.
The cavernous branch of the MMA arises from the petrosal branch and supplies the dura of the middle fossa and the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus. This branch frequently anastomoses with the posterolateral branch of the ILT. It may also communicate with the carotid branch of the ascending pharyngeal artery and the recurrent artery of the foramen lacerum.
Small tentorial branches arising from the posterior or petrosal divisions of the MMA may anastomose with: the superior branch of the ILT, or the tentorial artery from the MHT.
These connections constitute potential pathways for inadvertent ICA embolization.
Middle ear regionThe petrosal branch of the MMA has additional connections within the middle ear.8) It may anastomose with the internal auditory artery (from the anterior inferior cerebellar artery) and gives rise to the superior tympanic artery, contributing to the tympanic arterial network. The tympanic plexus includes: superior tympanic artery (MMA–petrosal branch), anterior tympanic artery (internal maxillary artery), inferior tympanic artery (ascending pharyngeal artery), and posterior tympanic (stylomastoid) artery. The stylomastoid artery and the superior tympanic artery form the facial arcade, which plays a major role in supplying the facial nerve. Thus, embolization in this region carries a risk of facial nerve palsy.
The MMA is central to both the vascular physiology of the dura and the pathophysiology of cSDH. Its embryological development, anatomical variations, and complex angioarchitecture explain the feasibility, efficacy, and potential risks of MMA embolization. A thorough understanding of these factors is essential for neurointerventionalists to perform safe and effective procedures, minimizing recurrence of cSDH while avoiding complications. As MMA embolization continues to gain prominence, mastery of the relevant anatomy and pathophysiology remains a cornerstone of optimal patient outcomes.
The author declares no conflicts of interest.