抄録
1. Spa-treatment is applicable not only to cases of clinically resolved or chronic inflammations, but also to subacute and exacerbated chronic cases, since in the latter the results are even more favourable.
2. Restriction of spa-treatment to chronic cases only does not afford a protection against exacerbations.
3. Treatment ought to be given in sanatoria or in-patient departments under continuous medical supervision enabling the physician to modify the treatment according to the patient's reaction.
4. Positive results of the treatment depend on the type of treatment, the intensity of which may differ with regard to both the number of individual treatments as well as their temperature.
5. Further investigations are necessary in order to define optimum type of treatment.
6. Spa-treatment may not be regarded as a recuperative type of therapy;it is exhausting and, therefore, the patient ought to be accorded a fortnight's leave for rest.
7. As regards the type of treatment outlined in the paper, its duration should not exceed 4 weeks.
8. The treatment can and ought to be repeated after clearingof the focal reaction and general restoration of strength.
9. Secondary post-inflammation sterility is more frequent than primary one.
10. Results are more favourable in treating secondary sterility.
11. Women in whom the morbid condition is less prolonged are more likely to conceive.
12. Clinical cure and tubal patency do not safeguard normal course of pregnancy.
13. Patients must be advised to avoid pregnancy before the termnation of the treatment.
