Journal of Occupational Health
Online ISSN : 1348-9585
Print ISSN : 1341-9145
ISSN-L : 1341-9145
Brief Reports
Determination Method for Mono- and Diethanolamine in Workplace Air by High-performance Liquid Chromatography
Akito Takeuchi Takashi KitadeAkira JukurogiWarren HendricksYuichiro KaifukuKenji ShibayamaShuichiro NatsumedaHirokazu OtaShu YamadaKimiaki SuminoAkira NameraSeiichiro Kanno
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2012 Volume 54 Issue 4 Pages 340-343

Details
Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this research was to develop a simultaneous determination method for monoethanol-amine (MEA) and diethanolamine (DEA) in workplace air for risk assessment. Methods: The characteristics of the proposed method, such as recovery, quantitation limit, reproducibility and storage stability of the samples, were examined. Results: An air sampling cassette containing two sulfuric acid-treated glass fiber filters was chosen as the sampler. The MEA and DEA were extracted from the sampler filters, derivatized with 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride and then analyzed by a high-performance liquid Chromatograph equipped with a fluorescence detector or photo-diode array detector. The overall recoveries from spiked samplers were 86–99 and 88–99% for MEA and DEA, respectively. The recovery after 5 days of storage in a refrigerator exceeded 95%. The overall limits of quantitation were 0.750 and 0.100 jug/sample for MEA and DEA, respectively. The relative standard deviations, which represent the overall reproducibility defined as precision, were 0.3–1.6 and 0.4–5.7% for MEA and DEA, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed method enables 4-h personal exposure monitoring of MEA and DEA at concentrations equaling 1/3,000–2 times the threshold limit value-time-weighted average (TLV-TWA: 3 ppmfor MEA, 1 mg/m3 for DEA) adopted by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists and also by the Japan Society for Occupational Health. The method is useful for estimating worker exposure to MEA and DEA.

Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

2012, Japan Society for Occupational Health
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top