Journal of Occupational Health
Online ISSN : 1348-9585
Print ISSN : 1341-9145
ISSN-L : 1341-9145
Brief Report
Metabolic Rate Prediction in Young and Old Men by Heart Rate, Ambient Temperature, Weight and Body Fat Percentage
Satoru Ueno Koichi IkedaTetsuo Tai
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2014 Volume 56 Issue 6 Pages 519-525

Details
Abstract

Objectives: An estimation of metabolic rate (MR) is needed to determine wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) reference values in order to reduce heat strain in physical workers. The aim of this study was to develop MR prediction equation for younger and older men in hot working environments. Methods: We measured the MR and heart rate (HR) of both younger and older men at ambient temperatures (Ta) of 25, 30 and 35°C while they cycled on a bicycle ergometer at a workload of 30, 45 and 60% of maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O2max). Seven younger male university students aged 22.9 ± 0.7 (mean ± SD) years and seven older male workers aged 61.7 ± 2.2 (mean ± SD) years participated in this study. MR, HR and rectal temperature (Tre) were measured during the study. HR, ambient temperature (Ta), body weight (BW) and body fat percentage (BF) served as predictors of MR using multivariate analysis. To increase the MR prediction accuracy, the following three alternative predictors of HR were used: HRres, calculated as 100 × [(HR − resting HR) / (maximal HR − resting HR)]; HRnet, calculated as (HR − resting HR); and HRi, calculated as (HR / resting HR). Results: The R2 value indicated that the models with HRres or HRnet were more accurate than those with HRi or HR. Ta had a significantly positive correlation with MR in older men. BW had a significantly positive correlation with MR in both younger and older men, and BF had a significantly negative correlation with MR in both younger and older men. Conclusions: HRres or HRnet enabled more accurate MR prediction than HR. BW and BF would increase the accuracy of MR prediction.(J Occup Health 2014; 56: 519–525)

Content from these authors

This article cannot obtain the latest cited-by information.

2014 by the Japan Society for Occupational Health
Previous article
feedback
Top