2021 Volume 68 Issue 4 Pages 221-229
Objectives To obtain suggestions for improving disaster-prevention literacy, this study elucidated the daily information-gathering behavior of residents living in areas affected by two Japanese natural disasters (the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011 and the Kanto-Tohoku Heavy Rainfall Disaster in September 2015) and examined factors affecting life backgrounds and disaster experiences.
Methods In June 2017, we administered a cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire to 1,065 households in areas affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake and the Kanto-Tohoku Heavy Rainfall. One person in each household responded to the questionnaire. Of 362 respondents (response rate 34.0%), 336 with definite attributes were analyzed. After ascertaining their daily information-gathering behavior, we applied binary logistic regression analysis, incorporating—as dependent variables—three variables previously used in times of disaster.
Results Of the respondents, 179 were men (53.3%); the average age (standard deviation) was 65.5 (10.6) years. Information-gathering modes used by more than half the subjects were “television,” “newspaper,” “conversation/word of mouth,” “radio,” and “community magazine” in descending order of use.
Examination of the factors of the three variables revealed the following. (1) Four variables were significantly and positively correlated with “conversation/word of mouth”: “woman” (1.82 odds ratio [OR]; 1.05-3.15 95% confidence interval [CI]); “I have” a co-resident family member (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.06-5.72); “I can expect” mutual aid from community residents (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.27-4.21); and “I feel more” fear of typhoons and heavy rains now than before (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.04-3.18). (2) “Radio” has two variables with significant and positive correlations: “I have” a co-resident family member (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.35-7.67) and “I was affected” by the Great East Japan Earthquake and the Kanto-Tohoku Heavy Rainfall Disaster (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.01.2.97). (3) Two variables are significantly correlated with “Internet service”: “Age” has a negative correlation (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.94); “I can expect” mutual aid from community residents has a positive correlation (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.19-5.93).
Conclusion Damage and fear instilled by natural disasters influence subsequent information-gathering behavior. Disaster prevention literacy in ordinary times can be improved because of the correlation between awareness of mutual aid in local communities and information-gathering behavior.
