2017 年 29 巻 7 号 p. 1272-1275
[Purpose] The purpose of this case study was to determine the effectiveness of bandaging the arm of a patient with secondary lymphedema on the patient’s quality of life, arm volume and arm function using an additional pad and taping along with some other standard therapy modalities for lymphedema. [Subjects and Methods] I used a bandage with an additional pad and taping, along with MLD, exercise, and skin care to treat a patient with unilateral breast-cancer-related arm lymphedema who had fibrotic tissue on her lower arm and hand. I made a pad called a “muff” and applied it under tape while using Vodder’s technique. Treatment was performed during 5 therapy sessions a week for 2 weeks. [Results] After the physiotherapy sessions, the excess edema volume decreased to 608 ml, and the percentage of excess volume (PEV) was 9.6%. The therapeutic efficacy, measured as percentage reduction of excess volume (PREV), was −79.5%, meaning that the edema volume was reduced 79.5%. The use of an additional pad and taping on a large edematous site with fibrotic changes can produce more efficacious lymphedema care. [Conclusion] The use of an additional pad and taping on a large edematous site with fibrotic changes has demonstrated a positive result in lymphedema management for a post mastectomy patient and, therefore, further studies on this method are suggested with a larger sample size.