社会心理学研究
Online ISSN : 2189-1338
Print ISSN : 0916-1503
原著論文
手続き的公正要因としての説明責任と鄭重さに対する中心的・周辺的認知処理の影響
裁判での弁護活動を模したコミュニケーション実験1)
今在 慶一朗
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー HTML

2016 年 31 巻 3 号 p. 184-192

詳細
抄録

According to a recent study (e.g., Ambrose & Schminke, 2001), politeness and accountability may be the major interpersonal factors in procedural justice. In this study, two experiments were conducted by using honorific language as a politeness factor and the amount of information that was the reason for the decision-maker’s judgment as an accountability factor. The effect of politeness was not rejected, but the effect of accountability was not observed in Experiment 1. A task that strengthens the participant’s attention to the explanation was added in Experiment 2; only the effect of the accountability factor was confirmed. As a result, it is suggested that the participants whose cognitive peripheral routes were activated perceived procedural fairness through politeness, and the participants whose cognitive central routes were activated perceived procedural fairness via accountability. In actual trials, the cognitive central route was activated when the disputant recognized personal interest, played a social role, or wanted to reveal convincing facts. Therefore, he or she probes ideal and logical objects such as the reasons for the judgments more than a judge’s polite behavior.

著者関連情報
© 2016 日本社会心理学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top