1996 巻 (1996) 9 号 p. 187-198
This paper provides how the development of ethnomethodology has correspond to today's analytic philosophy or neo-pragmatism.
First, we consider a sociologist's discussion that describes the connection between ethnomethodology and phenomenology/ordinary language and we find some points neglected in his discussion. Second, this paper introduces Rorty's argument on the linguistic turn and the correspondence of it to Garfinkel's approach.
Finally, we discuss Garfinkel's respecification of order has some origins and parallel flow to analytic and philosophy neo-pragmatism. This result would reflect a vision for an alternative respecification of society.