MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS
Online ISSN : 1347-5320
Print ISSN : 1345-9678
ISSN-L : 1345-9678
Engineering Materials and Their Applications
Damage Model Determination for Predicting Creep Rupture Time of 2 1/4Cr–1Mo Steel Weld Joints
Hitoshi IzunoMasahiko DemuraMasayoshi YamazakiMasaaki TabuchiDaisuke AbeKeisuke Torigata
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2021 Volume 62 Issue 7 Pages 1013-1022

Details
Abstract

In a creep damage analysis for a weld joint (WJ) using a damage model, it is important to select a damage model that properly reflects complex conditions of stress generated in the interface between the base metal and the heat-affected zone (HAZ). For 2 1/4Cr–1Mo steel, we examined what type of scalar stress is appropriate to properly reflects the conditions of stress generated around the HAZ for accurately predicting creep rupture time, in the framework of the time exhaustion rule, which evaluates damage as a function of stress. For a specimen of a round rod WJ through which an HAZ penetrates obliquely, we compared actual tests and finite element method (FEM) analysis, in temperature-stress ranges from 120 to 160 MPa at 823 K, and from 80 to 100 MPa at 873 K. Using FEM calculations, we evaluated the rupture time based on the time exhaustion rule, considering three types of scalar stress: the maximum principal stress, the equivalent stress, and the Huddleston stress. Comparing with the tests, we found that the scalar stress that gives an appropriate rupture time is the Huddleston stress. In this stress, the damage accumulation due to the creep deformation in the base metal (BM)-HAZ interface and the cavity formation due to the hydrostatic pressure are taken into account. Analyses of the stress distribution inside and outside of the HAZ and in the BM-HAZ interface indicated that, for the 2 1/4Cr–1Mo steel, the cavity formation due to the tensile hydrostatic pressure is also important when we evaluate damage. We optimized a parameter b, which regulates the balance in the Huddleston stress, so that the observed results are reproduced with the determination coefficient of R2 = 0.948, and we obtained the value of b as b = 0.34.

(a) Distributions of three principle stresses σ1, σ2, and σ3, equivalent stress σeq, and Huddleston stress σHud along the central axis of the FEM model; (b) Prediction performance of the time exhaustion rule model using Huddleston stress with the optimized parameter of b = 0.34. Fullsize Image
Content from these authors
© 2021 The Japan Institute of Metals and Materials
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top