Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
Online ISSN : 1880-2206
Print ISSN : 1347-3182
ISSN-L : 1347-3182
Major Papers
Application of Cardiac Gating to Improve the Reproducibility of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Measurements in the Head and Neck
Koung Mi KangSeung Hong ChoiDong Eun KimTae Jin YunJi-hoon KimChul-Ho SohnSun-Won Park
Author information

2017 Volume 16 Issue 3 Pages 190-202


Purpose: To prospectively evaluate whether cardiac gating can improve the reproducibility of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters in the head and neck, we performed IVIM diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using 4 b values (4b), 4 b values with cardiac gating (4b gating) and 17 b values (17b).

Methods: We performed IVIM DWI twice per person on nine healthy volunteers using 4b, 4b gating and 17b and five patients with head and neck masses using 4b gating and 17b. The ADC, perfusion fraction (f), diffusion coefficient (D) and perfusion-related diffusion coefficient (D*) were calculated in the brain, masticator muscle, parotid gland, submandibular gland, tonsil and masses. Intraclass coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis (BAA) and coefficient of variation (CV) were used to assess short-term test-retest reproducibility. Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test were used to investigate whether 4b, 4b gating or 17b had significant influences on the parameters.

Results: For normal tissues and masses, ICC was excellent for all maps except the D* map. All parameters showed the lowest CV in the 4b gating. BAA also revealed the narrowest 95% limits of agreement using 4b gating for all parameters. In the subgroup analysis, almost all parameters in brain, muscle, parotid gland and submandibular gland showed the best reproducibility using 4b gating. In the muscle, parotid gland and submandibular gland, the values of ADC, f and D were not significantly different between among the three methods.

Conclusion: 4b gating was more reproducible with respect to measurements of IVIM parameters in comparison with 4b or 17b.

Information related to the author
© 2017 by Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Previous article Next article