Neurosonology:神経超音波医学
Print ISSN : 0917-074X
ISSN-L : 0917-074X
超音波造影剤SH/TA-508の臨床第III相試験
―脳血管領域における共同研究の成績―
山口 武典古平 國泰矢坂 正弘森安 秀樹岡村 哲夫藤代 健太郎斎藤 勇塩貝 敏之米山 公啓高津 竜太郎吉村 正蔵月山 栄治鎌田 武信松本 昌泰半田 伸夫飯地 理寶學 英隆中谷 進大津 司吉川 信嘉川村 純一郎川本 未知西村 洋森竹 浩三永井 秀政小西 正治朔 義亮大坪 亮一木村 和美小川 暢也尾前 照雄山村 秀夫
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

1995 年 8 巻 4 号 p. 173-184

詳細
抄録

A study to determine the safety and usefulness of a ultrasonic contrast agent SH/TA-508 was made at 11 institutions across the country in 108 patients who needed the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disorders by means of the transcranial Doppler method.
The patients first received SH/TA-508 in a volume of 5 ml at a concentration of 300 mg/ml. When the first dose failed to yield a good effect, they further received 4 ml at a concentration of 400 mg/ml as a second dose, followed by, if necessary, 10 ml at the concentration of 300 mg/ml or 8 ml at the concentration of 400 mg/ml. The signal enhancement was evaluated in four grades: - (no effect), + (poor), 2+ (adequate), and 3+ (excessive) . A response rate (the percentage of“2+”or more) was obtained in 79.0% with the first injection. The cumulative response rate with the second and the third injection amounted to 83.9% and 86.2%, respectively. The duration of the signal enhancement was assessed as “good” in 67.0% with the first injection, increasing to 78.5% after the second injection and to 83.9% after the third injection. In short, a good signal enhancement lasting long enough could be obtained with SH/TA-508 in an initial volume of 5 ml at a concentration of 300 mg/ml. When this first dose failed to yield a good effect, the signal enhancement was found improved to some extent with an additional 4 ml at a concentration of 400 mg/ml.
The diagnosis with the use of SH/TA-508 was assessed as “obviously improved” in 78.8%. Further, SH/TA-508 was assessed as safe in 92.3% of the patients as there were no serious side effects observed. One patient complained of malaise as a moderate side effect, but it was not a serious one and spontaneously disappeared without special treatment. This patient also suffered aggravation of liver function; as the causal association with SH/TA-508 could not be totally denied, the patient was classified into “safety questionable” in safety evaluation. There were several other patients who complained of pain or burning sensation; the incidence of side effects was eventually concluded as 7.7%.
Based on all of these results together, SH/TA-508 was concluded as either “very useful” or “useful” in 82.2%.
In conclusion, SH/TA-508 may be expected as a clinically useful ultrasonic contrast agent since the agent has no significant safety problem and may be expected to yield a good signal enhancement and a more reliable diagnosis when used in the transcranial Doppler method for cerebrovascular disorders.

著者関連情報
© 日本脳神経超音波学会
前の記事
feedback
Top