季刊経済理論
Online ISSN : 2189-7719
Print ISSN : 1882-5184
ISSN-L : 1882-5184
『経済学批判』における人格の物象化と『資本論』における労働の物象化 : 史的唯物論および労働価値説と関連して
横山 章祐
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2005 年 42 巻 1 号 p. 65-76

詳細
抄録
"Zur Kritik der politischen Okonomie" and "Das Kapital", both are Marx's works. But these differ to recognition of labour, which is objectified to the commodity. In "Zur Kritik der politischen Okonomie", labour means individual labour. But in "Das Kapital", labour means private labour. This difference is reflected on 'Versachlichung' (i.e. objectifying) theory. In "Zur Kritik der politischen Okonomie", it is argued about Versachlichung of person. This concept is interpreted as 'relationship between person and person appears as a relationship between object and object'. But this thought has limited the meaning of 'labour' that produces the commodity to individual labour, since it is a fallacy. In "Das Kapital", Versachlichung of labour is discussed. Private labours are organised socially in commodity production society through the fact that the labour products are produced and exchanged as the commodities. Then private labours prove the social character by appearing in object forms, commodities. Anarchy production in commodity production society is controlled by independent motion of value. Fetishisms of commodity make this kind of control possible. Versachlichung theory has theoretical relation with historical materialism and labour theory of value. According to historical materialism, the productive relations are established by advancement level of productive powers. They decide social formation of labours. Therefore, labour has social character that is special historical. In regard to commodity production society, private labours appear in object forms, and prove the social character. Value substance theory is restricted consideration within labours, which are objectified to the commodities. But why is labour expressed to value? This problem is solved by Versachlichung theory. Commodities are exchanged on equivalence conforming to law of value. If under that social circumstance, labours appear in object forms, it can give to abstract human labour social character. Abstract human labour is not the concept that simply means the physiology equality of labour. It can give to equality as a human labour social character. That is abstract human labour.
著者関連情報
© 2005 経済理論学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top