Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B
Online ISSN : 1349-2896
Print ISSN : 0386-2208
Reviews
Emerging novel concept of chaperone therapies for protein misfolding diseases
Yoshiyuki SUZUKI
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー HTML

2014 年 90 巻 5 号 p. 145-162

詳細
Abstract

Chaperone therapy is a newly developed molecular therapeutic approach to protein misfolding diseases. Among them we found unstable mutant enzyme proteins in a few lysosomal diseases, resulting in rapid intracellular degradation and loss of function. Active-site binding low molecular competitive inhibitors (chemical chaperones) paradoxically stabilized and enhanced the enzyme activity in somatic cells by correction of the misfolding of enzyme protein. They reached the brain through the blood-brain barrier after oral administration, and corrected pathophysiology of the disease. In addition to these inhibitory chaperones, non-competitive chaperones without inhibitory bioactivity are being developed. Furthermore molecular chaperone therapy utilizing the heat shock protein and other chaperone proteins induced by small molecules has been experimentally tried to handle abnormally accumulated proteins as a new approach particularly to neurodegenerative diseases. These three types of chaperones are promising candidates for various types of diseases, genetic or non-genetic, and neurological or non-neurological, in addition to lysosomal diseases.

Introduction

At present more than 7000 inherited diseases are listed in Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man.1) They are mostly caused by single gene mutations, resulting in amino acid substitutions, structural alterations (protein misfolding) and functional defects due to rapid molecular turnover by the endoplasmic reticulum associated degradation system, even if they maintain the functional potential.2) Many of the functional proteins are enzymes and their defects (enzyme deficiency) cause diverse metabolic derangements in human somatic cells. The metabolic defect is expressed generally in various tissues and organs, but most prominently in the central nervous system as neurogenetic diseases in the majority of metabolic diseases.

Protein misfolding has become an important issue for possible molecular therapy in human diseases, as structural corrections by molecular engineering would restore the function of the protein in question, and metabolic abnormalities could be normalized.3)7) The diseases involving the lysosome, one of the important cellular organelles, have been our major target of research in this direction for the past 20 years. In the lysosome, various high molecular endogenous or exogenous compounds are digested under the acidic condition. The functional defect of somatic cells causes well recognized genetic disease, affecting mainly infants and young children, and rarely in adults. Cellular dysfunction caused by an excessive storage of substrates in the lysosome ensues in humans and other animals with neurological and general somatic manifestations.8) Severity of enzyme deficiency is variable in individual patients. In general, severe enzyme deficiency tends to cause development of clinical manifestations in early life.

Since mid-1960s, attempts have been made to treat patients with lysosomal diseases. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has been the most successful approach by intravenous administration of the functional human recombinant enzyme. First, purified β-glucosidase was shown to be effective for Gaucher disease, the most prevalent lysosomal storage disorder in humans.9) This approach has been extended to other lysosomal diseases, including Fabry disease, mucopolysaccharidoses, and Pompe disease.10) However, the effect has not been confirmed on brain pathology in patients with neurological manifestations. In recent years, however, trials to deliver the enzyme protein to the central nervous system have been made by intrathecal administration of the enzyme in pre-clinical and clinical studies of metachromatic leukodystrophy,11) mucopolysaccharidosis type 1,12)14) type 2,15) and type 6.16)

Turnover of mutant enzyme protein and correlation with the age of onset

In early 1980s we found that thiol (cysteine) protease inhibitors protected degradation of endogenous human or exogenous fungal β-galactosidase,17),18) an enzyme responsible for GM1-gangliosidosis in humans (Table 1). These results prompted us to search for a new molecular therapy of enzyme deficiency disorders in order to rescue apparently inactive mutant enzyme proteins.

Table 1. Effect of protease inhibitors on endogenous or exogenous β-galactosidase in human fibroblasts
Inhibitor Protease β-Galactosidase
(endogenous)*
β-Galactosidase
(exogenous)**
None   100 100
E-64 Thiol (Cysteine)*** 430 229
Leupeptin Thiol (Cysteine)*** 460 222
Antipain Thiol (Cysteine)*** 490 224
Chymostatin Thiol (Cysteine)*** 520 188
Elastatinal Elastase 60 103
Pepstatin Pepsin 100 97
Phosphoramidon Metallopeptidase 110 88
Bestatin Aminopeptidase 110 90

*Relative enzyme activity in human fibroblasts with cathepsin A deficiency (galactosialidosis).

**Relative enzyme activity in human fibroblasts with β-galactosidase deficiency (GM1-gangliosidosis) exogenously supplied with Aspergillus oryzae β-galactosidase.

***Thiol (cysteine) proteases = Cathepsin B, H, L. Modified from refs. 17 and 18.

In this connection we found a correlation between residual β-galactosidase activity and clinical onset in GM1-gangliosidosis patients (Fig. 1).19) Essentially the same data with theoretical calculations had been reported for some other lysosomal diseases.20)

Fig. 1.

Correlation between residual β-galactosidase activity and clinical onset. The amount of residual enzyme activity shows positive correlation with the age of onset in various phenotypic forms of β-galactosidase deficiency disorders. Theoretically at least 10% of normal enzyme activity is necessary for washout of the storage substrate. The age of onset in patients expressing enzyme activity above this level will be beyond the human life span. See the text for more details. Reproduced from ref. 19 with minor modifications.

In our data the amount of residual enzyme activity showed positive parabolic correlation with the age of onset in various phenotypic forms of β-galactosidase deficiency disorders. The enzyme activity was generally less than 3% of the control mean in infantile GM1-gangliosidosis, 3%–6% in juvenile GM1-gangliosidosis, and more than 6% in late onset (adult/chronic) GM1-gangliosidosis patients. In addition, Morquio B disease, another non-neurological phenotype of β-galactosidase deficiency, showed relatively high residual enzyme activity. Based on these observations, we anticipated that at least 10% of normal enzyme activity is necessary for washout of the storage substrate in somatic cells, particularly in neuronal cells. The age of onset in patients expressing the enzyme activity above this level will be theoretically beyond the human life span. However, we should keep in mind that this theoretical curve was drawn on the basis of enzyme assay results using cultured skin fibroblasts (not neuronal cells) and a synthetic fluorogenic substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl β-galactopyranoside (not natural substrates like ganglioside GM1 or keratan sulfate). In this calculation, for technical reasons, substrate specificity was not taken into account, although mutant enzymes show different spectra in GM1-gangliosidosis and Morquio B disease.21)

Theoretical background of chaperone therapy

In the last decade of the 20th century we found that some mutant α-galactosidase A proteins were unstable and unable to express catalytic activities in somatic cells from Fabry patients.22) Galactose and a galactose analogue compound 1-deoxygalactonojirimycin (DGJ) were effective as chaperones to restore the mutant α-galactosidase A activity in Fabry cells and tissues.23),24) Furthermore another galactose analogue N-octyl-4-epi-β-valienamine (NOEV) was found to be effective to restore the mutant β-galactosidase activity in GM1-gangliosidosis cells and tissues.25)

Molecular pathology of inherited metabolic diseases can be generally classified into the following three major conditions related to the structure and function of mutant proteins.26)

  1. (a)   Biosynthetic defect of the protein in question.
  2. (b)   Defect of biological activity.
  3. (c)   Unstable mutant protein with normal or near-normal biological activity.

A substrate analogue inhibitor binds to a mutant lysosomal misfolding protein as a kind of chaperone (chemical chaperone), to induce normal molecular folding at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)/Golgi compartment in somatic cells, resulting in formation of a stable molecular complex at neutral pH. The chaperone compound itself, however, does not refold the target protein, but induces the equilibrium toward the natural correct folding after binding to the active site of wild-type or mutant protein. The protein-chaperone complex is safely transported to the lysosome, where it dissociates under the acidic condition, the mutant enzyme remains stabilized in its normal folding structure, and its catalytic function is expressed (Fig. 2). These molecular events have been partially clarified by analytical and morphological analyses, and computer-assisted prediction of molecular interactions.19),27) This approach is particularly important for correction of brain pathology if they are delivered to the central nervous system through the blood-brain barrier.19),26) Chaperone therapy is theoretically effective in 30–60% of patients with Fabry disease and GM1-gangliosidosis patients.28),29)

Fig. 2.

Postulated molecular events between mutant enzyme molecules and chaperone compounds. Mutant enzyme protein is unstable in the ER-Golgi compartment at neutral pH, and rapidly degraded or aggregated possibly to cause ER stress. An appropriate substrate analogue inhibitor binds to misfolded mutant protein as chaperone at the ER-Golgi compartment in somatic cells, resulting in normal folding and formation of a stable complex at neutral pH. The protein-chaperone complex is safely transported to the lysosome. The complex is dissociated under the acidic condition and in the presence of excessive storage of the substrate. The mutant enzyme remains stabilized, and express catalytic function. The released chaperone is either secreted from the cell or recycled to interact with another mutant protein molecule. Reproduced from ref. 19 with minor modifications.

This is the principle of chaperone therapy to restore the enzyme activity by low molecule inhibitors (chaperones) with appropriate molecular structure fitting in the enzyme molecule. A similar concept was presented for cystic fibrosis and other diseases.3),30)

Chaperon (without e) was imported from the French language, and appeared in the English literature in 1380, meaning a hood or cap worn by nobles.31) The word usage gradually changed over time, and started meaning an elderly woman accompanying a young unmarried lady in public as guide and protector (1720).31) For this reason, chaperone (with e) is often used as a feminine word at present, and also in this article. Then molecular chaperone appeared as an endogenous protein for proper folding and/or assembly of another protein or protein complex,32) followed by chemical chaperone33) and chaperone therapy.34),35) At present chemical or pharmacological chaperone is used as a low molecular compound that stabilizes mutant protein and induces expression of its biological activity in the cell, by accelerating correct folding of the relevant protein molecule.

Chaperone therapy for lysosomal diseases

α-Galactosidase A deficiency (Fabry disease).

Fabry disease is an inherited generalized vasculopathy caused by α-galactosidase A gene mutations, resulting in enzyme deficiency and an increasing storage of globotriaosylceramide in the vascular endothelium. Clinically the patients present with acroparesthesia, ankiokeratoma and hypohydrosis of the skin in the early stage of the disease, and progressive involvement of the brain, heart, and kidneys after middle ages. More than 500 gene mutations coding for the enzyme have been recorded in Fabry patients in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD).36) In this disease the p.Q279E mutant enzyme was low in catalytic activity, and unstable at relatively high temperature and also at neutral pH.22) It was rapidly degraded because of molecular misfolding. A high dose of galactose in the culture medium induced a high expression of catalytic activity in Fabry lymphoblasts and mutant enzyme-expressing COS-1 cells.23) However, we thought that galactose was practically not an ideal candidate for restoration of the mutant enzyme in human tissues, as it is rapidly metabolized in cells and tissues, and the continuously high galactose concentration in somatic cells could cause direct galactose intoxication such as galactosemia, and result in pathological osmolarity in the extracellular fluid higher than that in the human blood under the physiological condition, causing significant dehydration, shrinkage and dysfunction of somatic cells. A long-term treatment with galactose at such a high dose would not be realistic, although a human experiment of intravenous galactose infusion every other day for 2 years was reported, achieving a beneficial effect on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a Fabry patient.37) DGJ showed the chaperone effect specifically on mutant α-galactosidase A. Its chaperone activity toward mutant β-galactosidase was 50-fold lower in a culture system experiment.38) The phase 3 clinical study is currently in progress.

β-Galactosidase deficiency (GM1-gagliosidosis and Morquio B disease).

GM1-gagliosidosis is a relatively rare lysosomal disease, presenting clinically with progressive neurological deterioration mainly in infancy and childhood with various somatic manifestations.21) The general incidence was estimated at 1:100,000–200,000 live births.39) It was reported to be the 4th common sphingolipidosis in Turkey.40) Furthermore, there are some ethnic groups with a surprisingly high incidence.21) After our report on β-galactosidase cDNA cloning,41) extensive mutation data have been accumulated in GM1-gagliosidosis and Morquio B patients,21),42),43) and currently more than 160 mutations have been identified in HGMD.36) Mutations in GM1-gangliosidosis patients are heterogeneous and complex. Some common mutations have been identified: p.R482H in Italian patients with infantile GM1-gangliosidosis; p.R208C in American patients with infantile GM1-gangliosidosis; p.R201C in Japanese patients with juvenile GM1-gangliosidosis; and p.I51T in Japanese patients with adult GM1-gangliosidosis.21) Another mutation p.W273L is known to cause Morquio B disease, the second β-galactosidase deficiency phenotype (generalized skeletal dysplasia).43)

We started the chaperone experiment on β-galactosidase immediately after the experiments on α-galactosidase A. The first report was published on a newly synthesized organic compound valienamine derivative NOEV as a chemical chaperone for β-galactosidase toward genetically engineered GM1-gangliosidosis model mice.25),44) It is a potent competitive inhibitor of β-galactosidase in vitro, and restores mutant enzyme activities in somatic cells from patients with GM1-gangliosidosis. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed rapid intestinal absorption and renal excretion after oral administration of NOEV.45) It was delivered to the central nervous system through the blood-brain barrier to achieve a high expression of the apparently deficient β-galactosidase activity in the GM1-gangliosidosis model mice. NOEV treatment starting at the early stage of disease resulted in remarkable arrest of neurological progression within a few months with prolongation of survival time (Fig. 3).45)

Fig. 3.

Chaperone effect of NOEV on the GM1-gangliosidosis model mouse. After oral administration, the chaperone NOEV enters the bloodstream without intestinal digestion, is delivered to the central nervous system through the blood-brain barrier, and finally exhibits its chaperone activity toward the dormant enzyme protein, achieving biochemical, pathological and clinical effects in GM1-gangliosidosis model mice. No longstanding storage has been observed in mouse cells during and after the NOEV treatment. No recognizable clinical or pathological adverse effects were observed. The effective dose was estimated at 10–30 mg/kg/day with ad libitum oral administration of the water solution. The dose may be significantly reduced by intermittent oral administration (once in 2–3 days) for clinical practice. Summarized from refs. 19, 45, and 97.

Recently a new chaperone MTD118, a bicyclic DGJ derivative with an advantage of simpler chemical synthesis as compared to NOEV,46) was found to show a chaperone spectrum complementary to that of NOEV for some mutant genes (Table 2).29),47) Thus, the combination of NOEV and MTD118 will cover 60–70% of patients with GM1-gangliosidosis, and hopefully those with Morquio B disease. Galactose was reported to be a potential chemical chaperone in some GM1-gangliosidosis mutations as well as in Fabry disease.48)

Table 2. Chaperone effect of MTD118 on GM1-gangliosidosis cells and model mice*
Bioactivity (Cultured fibroblasts from patients)
1. Enzyme inhibition in vitro; IC50 = 37 mM (pH 5) or 5 mM (pH 7).
2. Enzyme stabilization up to 160 µM in vitro.
3. Chaperone effect at 20–480 µM (max at 240–320 µM) for 24 missense mutants.
4. No cytotoxicity up to 600 µM.
Phamacokinetics (GM1-gangliosidosis model mouse)
1. Delivery to the central nervous system by oral administration (water solution).
2. Enhancement of mutant p.R201C activities in the brain (5 or 10 m, 1 week).
3. Reduction of substrate accumulation in neurons.
4. Restoration of autophagic impairment in brain.

*Summarized from refs. 29 and 47.

In GM1-gangliosidosis, chaperone therapy experiments have been utilized for analysis of pathogenesis in GM1-gangliosidosis.49),50) Autophagy and mitochondrial dysfunction were corrected by NOEV administration to GM1-gangliosidosis model mice. The molecular background of chaperone therapy has been analyzed using NOEV and other new chaperone candidates.46),51),52) The enzyme-chaperone complex is stable at neutral pH, and dissociates at acidic pH because of an increase of free binding energy.19),27)

α-Glucosidase deficiency (Pompe disease).

Pompe disease is a cardiomyopathy with a wide clinical spectrum, occurring at varying ages from early infancy to late adulthood. Abnormal storage of glycogen in the lysosome is caused by lysosomal α-glucosidase gene mutations, resulting in enzyme deficiency. ERT has been used particularly for progressive myopathies. Chaperones 1-deoxynojirimycin and its analogues have been tried for chaperone therapy in this disease.53) Combination of chaperone therapy with N-(n-butyl)deoxynojirimycin and ERT has been tried in Pompe patients. A remarkable enhancement of the enzyme activity was achieved as compared to the enzyme replacement alone.54) A series of non-iminosugar chaperones were screened in the NIH Small Molecule Repository, and exhibited α-glucosidase chaperone activities.55)

Furthermore, some non-competitive chaperones have been reported for a few diseases including Pompe disease (see below).

β-Glucosidase deficiency (Gaucher disease).

Gaucher disease is a group of diverse clinical manifestations involving both the central nervous system and extraneural visceral organs, caused by β-glucosidase gene mutations, resulting in enzyme deficiency and massive storage of glucosylceramide. More than 400 gene mutations have been recorded in HGMD.36) Clinically it is classified into three major phenotypes: chronic non-neuronopathic (adult), acute neuronopathic (infantile), and subacute neuronopathic (juvenile). ERT is available for non-neuronopathic patients, and the clinical effect has been well documented.10) However, neurological manifestations have not been controlled by this therapeutic approach. After the first report on a chemical chaperone N-(n-nonyl)deoxynojirimycin,56) we also tried to develop chaperone compounds for the brain damage in Gaucher disease. N-octyl-β-valienamine, an epimer of NOEV, was found as a new chaperone compound for this disease.57) Although its effectiveness was confirmed in the cell culture system, animal studies were not carried out since appropriate animal models have not been available to us as yet.

Several different approaches have been tried to develop new chaperones for Gaucher disease. High throughput screening of a collection of compounds for the mutant Gaucher enzyme (p.N370S) revealed 14 new lead inhibitors and 30 lead activators.58) Another group reported that a series of N-substituted epsilon-hexonolactams showed enhancements to p.N370S mutant β-glucosidase activity.59) Some synthetic quinazoline analogues were β-glucosidase inhibitors with chaperone activity.60) Furthermore, picomolar concentrations of aminocyclitols are sufficient to enhance activity in the p.L444P variant, which produces a severe neuronopathic form of Gaucher disease.61)

Some non-inhibitory pyrazolpyrimidine series compounds were found to be allosteric enzyme activators (non-competitive chaperones) without inhibition of the enzyme activity at high concentrations62) (see below).

Recently ambroxol hydrochloride, a commercially available expectorant drug, was reported to be an excellent chaperone candidate for Gaucher disease.63) It was found by a systematic screening of 1040 FDA approved drugs. This is a pH-dependent mixed-type inhibitor of β-glucosidase. The p.N370S and p.F213I mutant enzyme activities were enhanced by ambroxol in Gaucher fibroblasts. Subsequently we tried to treat neuronopathic Gaucher patients with p.N188S mutation by long-term oral administration of ambroxol hydrochloride. They showed remarkable neurological improvements, particularly oculomotor dysfunction and myoclonus. Further studies are in progress [Narita et al., unpublished data]. Preliminary results also on non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease were reported from Israel.64)

β-Hexosaminidase deficiency (GM2-gangliosidoses).

GM2-Gangliosidoses are a group of neurogenetic diseases due to β-hexosaminidase deficiency (Tay-Sachs disease and Sandhoff disease). Two genes are responsible for the pathogenesis of these diseases. The HEXA gene mutation leads to the mutant α-subunit of the enzyme, causing β-hexosaminidase A (αβ) deficiency in Tay-Sachs disease, and the HEXB gene mutation, causing both β-hexosaminidases A (αβ) and B (ββ) deficiency in Sandhoff disease. Some enzyme inhibitors restored the catalytic activity in fibroblasts.65) Among them an antimalarial drug pyrimethamine was found as the most potent inhibitor.66) It binds to the active site of β-hexosaminidase B,67) and was subjected to clinical trials for GM2-Gangliosidoses as monotherapy for either of the GM2-gangliosidosis patients.68) Pyrimethamine treatment enhanced leukocyte enzyme β-hexosaminidase A activity but significant clinical side effects were experienced in most patients at or above 75 mg doses per day. Further plans are underway to extend this clinical approach.

Chaperone therapy for non-lysosomal diseases

Starting with a few lysosomal and non-lysosomal diseases, such as cystic fibrosis and some neurodegenerative disease as candidate targets, many other types of genetic and non-genetic diseases have been suggested to be the candidates for chaperone therapy. In Table 3, the diseases are listed for possible chaperone therapy by correction and normalization of misfolding proteins in genetic or non-genetic diseases, or protein modifications in other pathological conditions such as prion disease69) or viral infection (capsid assembly).70) The list includes a large number of diseases with varying pathogenesis and clinical manifestations. At present, however, none of them has been established for clinical practice as yet, although some diseases have reached the stage of human clinical studies.

Table 3. Diseases reported for possible chaperone therapy
Pathophysiology Disease Chaperone type*
Lysosome Fabry disease23),24),37) 1a
GM1-gangliosidosis25),29),45),47),97) 1a
Morquio B disease25),29),98) 1a
Krabbe disease99),100) 1a
Gaucher disease56),62),63),101) 1a, 1b
Schindler-Kanzaki disease102) 1a
GM2-gangliosidosis65),103) 1a
Metachromatic leukodystrophy11) 1a, 1b
Pompe disease53),83),104),105) 1a, 1b
Niemann-Pick A/B disease93),94) 2
Niemann-Pick C disease106),107) 1b
Mucolipidosis IV108) 1b
Late infantile ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL2)109) 1**
Juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCL3; Batten)110) 1**
Mucopolysaccharidosis type 3 (Sanfilippo)111)113) 1a
Peroxisome Adrenoleukodystrophy114) 1a
Zellweger disease115) 1b
Mitochondrion Argyrophilic grain disease116) 2
Amino acid
Organic acid
Phenylketonuria80),81),95),117) 1b, 2
Hyperoxaluria82),118) 1b
Homocystinuria118) 1**
Methylmalonic aciduria85) 1b
Carbohydrate Type 1 galactosemia119) 1**
MAN1B1-glycoprotein synthesis disorder120) 1b
Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia5) 1b
Neurodegeneration Neurodegenerative diseases87),91),121) 2
Parkinson disease91),92),122)125) 2
Alzheimer disease91),124),126),127) 2
Huntington disease91),128),129) 2
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis91),130) 2
Type 1 spinocerebellar ataxia90) 2
l-DOPA-responsive dystonia117) 1b
Prion disease69),131),132) 1b
Creutzfeld-Jakob disease6) 2
Congenital myopathy Myosinopathies133) 2
Other genetic diseases Cystic fibrosis30),71),134) 1b
Wilson disease135) 2
Familial intrahepatic cholestasis136),137) 1b
Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus138),139) 1b
Retinitis pigmentosa140)142) 1b
Keratinopathy143) 1b
Epidermolysis bullosa simplex144) 1b
G-protein-coupled receptor diseases145)149) 1b
Thyroid hormone activating enzyme type 2 deiodinase deficiency150) 1b
Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism5) 1b
Early-onset obesity caused by melanocortin-4 receptor151) 1b
Desmin-related cardiomyopathy152) 1b
Infection Human immunodeficiency virus70) 1b
Cholera153) 1b
Malignancy
Aging
Multiple myeloma154) 1a
Organ aging155) 2

*1a = low molecule chaperone, inhibitory; 1b = low molecule chaperone, non-inhibitory; 2 = protein chaperone.

**Theoretical prediction; experimental data not shown.

Among them two classical genetic diseases are taken for a short overview. Cystic fibrosis was the first non-lysosomal disease that attracted interest in misfolding of a transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). The most common mutation p.F508del causes misfolding of this protein, resulting in rapid molecular degradation. One strategy to treat this pathophysiology was to protect against proteolytic cleavage by the use of molecular stabilizers (chemical chaperones) such as glycerol, trimethylamine N-oxide and deuterated water.30),71) In other reports, the cellular trafficking was successfully restored in the mutant cells. Two groups of compounds have been reported: benzo[c]quinolizinium compounds, selective inhibitors of the p.F508del-CFTR protein,72),73) and correctors promoting the proper folding of p.F508del-CFTR.74) Further high-throughput screening revealed some quinazoline-based compounds as candidate chaperones.75)78)

Phenylketonuria is a classical inborn error of metabolism caused by mutations of the gene encoding phenylalanine hydroxylase. Most of them lead to protein folding defects, resulting in enzyme deficiency due to increased protein degradation. The enzyme cofactor (6R)-1-erythro-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin showed a therapeutic chaperone effect in some patients.79) Subsequent studies identified new non-inhibitory chaperones80),81) (see below).

Emerging concept of chaperone therapies

Inhibitory chaperone therapy.

The trial of chaperone therapy was started for some lysosomal diseases (Fabry disease, GM1-gangliosidosis, Gaucher disease)19) and non-lysosomal diseases such as cystic fibrosis. The intralysosomal environment is uniquely acidic. We were able to utilize the different pH environments at two compartments, ER/Golgi and the lysosome, for chaperone therapy. A competitive enzyme inhibitor (chaperone) binds to the active site of the target enzyme at ER under the neutral condition to form a stable complex, which is transported to the lysosome, where the complex dissociates under the acidic condition, due to less strong molecular binding, in the lysosome. The free mutant enzyme remains stable and becomes catalytically active.19)

This is the concept of inhibitory chaperone therapy. An in vitro inhibitor acts paradoxically as an intracellular enhancer at low concentrations. We should select an appropriate concentration of the chaperone compound in question in order to attain a chaperone activity without adverse (inhibitory) effect to the cell. Chaperone therapy will be more safely conducted if a non-inhibitory compound is available for restoration of an inactive protein caused by misfolding, although most of the inhibitory chaperones discovered till present show a wide range of efficacy in the cells, animals, and human patients without significantly adverse effects.

Non-inhibitory (allosteric) chaperone therapy.

Recently enzyme cofactors were reported to be chaperones in some diseases; tetrahydrobiopterin in phenylketonuria,81) and pyridoxal 5′-phosphate and aminooxyacetic acid in primary hyperoxaluria type 1.82) In line with these findings, new chaperones without inhibitory bioactivity have been identified and called non-inhibitory chaperones,62) allosteric chaperones,83) or non-competitive chaperones.84) They are non-substrate-like compounds that exhibit allosteric chaperone activities, not necessarily binding to the active site of the enzyme.

A set of pyrazolopyrimidines were identified by high throughput screening as activators of β-glucosidase responsible for Gaucher disease.62) Additional studies revealed that the activity in assays using p.N370S mutant or wild type spleen homogenate preparations was 3–10 fold better than purified enzyme conditions. This biological activity was specific to glucocerebrosidase.

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) was reported to be a novel allosteric chaperone for α-glucosidase in Pompe disease. It improved the stability and catalytic activity of recombinant α-glucosidase as a function of pH and temperature without disrupting its catalytic activity. NAC does not interact with the catalytic domain of the enzyme. The culture cells and model mice responded better when NAC was combined with ERT.83)

Additionally the candidate molecules were found by an in silico-in vitro-in vivo approach, leading to stabilization of the mutant enzyme p.V106A without relevant inhibitory effects in phenylketonuria.81) However, ligand-binding affinity was mutation specific. Also high-throughput ligand screening revealed a compound that significantly increased the mutant enzyme activity in methylmalonic aciduria and did not act as an inhibitor of the purified enzyme protein.85)

Molecular chaperone therapy.

There are reports to utilize endogenous heat shock proteins (Hsp) for stabilization of mutant proteins in some diseases by using small molecules as molecular chaperone inducers, mainly focusing on neurodegenerative diseases; polyglutamine (polyQ) diseases and tauopathies.6),86)89) Major classes of Hsp are Hsp100, Hsp90, Hsp70, Hsp60 and the small Hsp. These molecular chaperones have important damage-control functions during and following stress. Under in vitro conditions, many chaperones can bind chemically unfolded polypeptides and prevent aggregation. They are also involved in aggregate solubilization.

Overexpression of Hsp70 was found to be effective for type 1 spinocerebellar ataxia.90) Chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp40 may play a role in some human neurodegenerative disorders like Parkinson disease and Alzheimer disease.86)

A variety of molecular chaperones such as Hsp70 and Hsp40 have been demonstrated to exert therapeutic effects against various experimental models of polyQ diseases. In addition, small chemical activators of heat shock transcription factor 1, such as geldanamycin and its derivative 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin, are effective not only in polyQ disease models but also in other neurodegenerative disease models by inducing multiple endogenous molecular chaperones. It is expected that blood-brain-barrier-permeable molecular chaperone inducers become available as new drugs for neurodegenerative diseases in the near future.91)

Hsp70 and its co-chaperone can arrest neurodegeneration by preventing α-synuclein misfolding, oligomerization and aggregation in vitro and in Parkinson disease animal models. Hsp104 is able to resolve disordered protein aggregates and cross β-amyloid conformers. These chaperones have a complementary effect and can be a target for therapeutic intervention in Parkinson disease.92)

Hsp70 is known to inhibit lysosomal membrane permeabilization, a hallmark of stress-induced cell death. Niemann-Pick disease (A and B) caused by sphingomyelinase deficiency is associated with a marked decrease in lysosomal stability. It is possible that this phenotype can be effectively corrected by treatment utilizing Hsp70.93),94)

In a study, Hsp70/Hsp40, Hsp90 as well as a pharmacological chaperone, 3-amino-2-benzyl-7-nitro-4-(2-quinolyl)-1,2-dihydroisoquinolin-1-one, partly inhibited the self-association process of the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase, suggesting a possible approach to phenylketonuria therapy.95)

The research in this direction will reveal a new scope for chaperone therapy in future. In Table 4, possible chaperone therapies are listed utilizing small molecules or protein chaperones induced by small molecules for various types of misfolding diseases, genetic or non-genetic, and neuronopathic or non-neuronopathic. Diverse approaches are expected to find new types of chaperone compounds with different molecular actions toward misfolding proteins.

Table 4. Chaperone therapies for protein misfolding diseases
1. Low molecule chaperone (exogenous) = pharmacological chaperone; chemical chaperone
 (a) Competitive inhibitor (inhibitory chaperone)
 (b) Non-competitive stabilizer (non-inhibitory/non-competitive/allosteric chaperone)
Target diseases: Both genetic and non-genetic (neuronopathic or non-neuronopathic)
2. Protein chaperone (endogenous) = molecular chaperone induced by small molecules
Target diseases: Neurodegenerative diseases (polyQ diseases, tauopathies)
Myopathies (myosin chaperone)
Wilson disease (copper chaperone)

Conclusion

Chaperone therapy has been proposed mainly as a new therapeutic approach to neuronopathic lysosomal diseases and non-neuronopathic genetic diseases such as cystic fibrosis. Currently ERT is widely used for extraneural tissue pathology with successful achievements in lysosomal diseases. The effect of ERT on non-neural tissues has been well documented, but two major disadvantages are present: intravenous administration for life at regular intervals, and poor effect to the central nervous system pathology. As stated above, some clinical experiments are in progress, including intrathecal administration of the enzyme protein.

A second clinical approach has been proposed to reduce the storage substrates by inhibition of glucosyltransferase: substrate reduction therapy.96) This new approach is meant to diminish glucosylceramide in the cell, the first step product of glycosphingolipid synthesis. In fact this trial has been reported not only for Gaucher disease with glucosylceramide storage but also for Niemann-Pick C disease, Sandhoff disease and other diseases with substrate storage of more complex types. However, this approach inevitably deprives somatic cells of biologically active glycosphingolipids to some extent, possibly ensuing dysfunction of various types in somatic cells. In fact clinical side effects have been recorded at therapeutic dose levels even in healthy individuals, particularly headache and diarrhea. This is the most important issue when this therapeutic approach is discussed for future clinical practice. At present new compounds are on clinical trial with less adverse effects.

Chaperone therapy, originally proposed as chemical chaperone therapy, has been also called pharmacological chaperone therapy or enzyme enhancement therapy at present. Advantage of this new approach is non-invasive oral drug administration to enhance apparently missing enzyme activity and to restore normal metabolic turnover in cells and tissues. Moreover, small molecule chaperones reach the central nervous system, thus potentially correcting pathophysiology of currently non-treatable genetic brain diseases. A drawback is that it is a mutation-specific drug therapy, and we admit that not all patients under the diagnosis of a single genetic disease can be treated by one chaperone drug, although at least one-third to one-half of patients can be the target of this therapeutic trial. In addition combination of two or more chaperone compounds will reach a broader chaperone spectrum at least to two-thirds of patients. A combination therapy with ERT may be useful.

Neurological effectiveness has been confirmed for GM1-gangliosidosis model mice (NOEV) and human Gaucher patients [ambroxol; Narita et al., unpublished data]. No clinically recognizable adverse effects have been observed so far at the effective doses in both mice and humans. We hope that further experiments will confirm validity of this new therapeutic concept in clinical practice in the near future.

Profile

Yoshiyuki Suzuki completed his doctorate in medical science with the clinical analysis of movements and posture in cerebral palsy patients at the University of Tokyo in 1966. After his clinical studies of neurological diseases, he started biochemical and molecular analyses of lysosomal diseases at various research institutions in the United States and Japan. His major scientific achievements include discovery of the deficient enzyme (galactosylceramidase) in Krabbe disease (1970–71) at University of Pennsylvania; pathogenesis of galactosialidosis (1977–83) at The University of Tokyo; molecular pathology of β-galactosidase deficiency disorders, particularly GM1-gangliosidosis (1985–92) at National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, and The Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science (Rinshoken); and then proposal of the concept of chaperone therapy for lysosomal diseases (1995-present) at Rinshoken, and International University of Health and Welfare. This concept has opened a new scope for molecular therapy of lysosomal diseases, and is expanding to a large number of other genetic and non-genetic diseases. He was awarded Weil Award (American Association of Neuropathologists), Mitsukoshi Medical Foundation Prize, Japan IBM Prize (Japanese Society for Inborn Errors of Metabolism), Frank Ford Memorial Award (International Child Neurology Association) and other prestigious awards. He was Visiting Professor at University of Siena (Italy), Visiting Professor at Peking University First Teaching Hospital (China), and Honorary Professor at Almaty State Medical Institute of Postgraduate Education (Kazakhstan). Additionally his international activities include International Child Neurology Association (President, Secretary), and World Health Organization (NGO for Prevention and Treatment of Neurological Diseases, International Task Force for Developmental Disabilities in Children, and Chair of the Child Neurology Working Group). He is currently Special Visiting Scientist at Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports, and Technology of Japan (13680918, 14207106) and from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan (H10-No-006, H14-Kokoro-017, H17-Kokoro-019, H20-Kokoro-022, H19-Nanji-Ippan-002, H22-Nanji-Ippan-002), and a grant from Japan Science and Technology Agency (AS232Z00009G). I thank all collaborators contributing to this research project at various institutions.

References
 
© 2014 The Japan Academy
feedback
Top