Surgery for Cerebral Stroke
Online ISSN : 1880-4683
Print ISSN : 0914-5508
ISSN-L : 0914-5508
Original Articles
Should Asymptomatic Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients 75 Years or Older be Treated by Clipping or Coiling?: A Single-Center Experience
Kunihiko UMEZAWASatoshi KIMURAKunikazu KUROSAKITetsuro TAKEGAMIKimitoshi SATO
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2017 Volume 45 Issue 2 Pages 101-108

Details
Abstract

Background: The decision to treat unruptured aneurysms (uANs) includes an analysis of the natural history, risks of treatment, and potential benefits of a lifelong cure for each patient. With the increase in average life expectancy and widespread use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is estimated that the number of uANs diagnosed in elderly patients will increase. However, outcomes associated with surgical and endovascular treatments for uANs in elderly patients remain unclear.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes in elderly patients with asymptomatic uANs who underwent either clipping or coiling.
Methods: In this retrospective study, 17 consecutive elderly patients (age ≧ 75 years) with asymptomatic uANs underwent clipping or coiling at our institution between April 2010 and March 2015. The clinical (Glasgow Outcome Scale at discharge) and postoperative radiological results in this group were compared with a group of younger patients with uANs (< 75 years, n=93), and with consecutive patients with concurrent subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to ruptured aneurysms: ≧ 75 years (n = 18) and < 75 years of age (n = 101).
Results: A total of 17 patients ≧ 75 years of age (average: 79.8 years, range 75-85) with a total of 20 asymptomatic uANs were treated with either surgical (n=10) or endovascular procedures (n=8).
In contrast with the overall results in patients with SAH (older patients fare worse than their younger counterparts: good recovery, 22% vs. 56%, respectively), posttreatment neurological deficits in patient with uANs were more common in the younger group (< 75 years old, 5%) than in the older group (≧ 75 years old, 0%); however, there was no statistical difference. On the contrary, the posttreatment occurrence of chronic subdural hematoma in the elderly (16.7%) was more common than in the younger group (1%), and the difference was significant.
Surgically treated elderly patients with uANs had a significantly longer hospital stay than elderly patients who underwent endovascular treatment (25.7 days vs. 5.3 days).
Moreover, among all surgically treated patients with a good neurological outcome, increased age was associated with an increased length of hospital stay. In contrast to the surgically treated group, the length of hospital stay in the endovascular treatment group did not vary with age.
Conclusion: Endovascular and surgical treatments for uAN in patients ≧ 75 years old appear to be feasible and safe.
With regard to safety and length of hospital stay, coiling is a better method than clipping for elderly patients with uAN.

Content from these authors
© 2017 by The Japanese Society on Surgery for Cerebral Stroke
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top