Yonago Acta Medica
Online ISSN : 1346-8049
ISSN-L : 0513-5710
Original Article
Training in the Departments of Urology and Surgery for Gynecologists in Japan
Hiroaki KomatsuSatoru TsukiharaShinya SatoMasako SarugamiTetsuro OishiFuminori TaniguchiTasuku HaradaYasunobu Kanamori
Author information

2019 Volume 62 Issue 2 Pages 198-203


Background The authors wanted to understand the current situation concerning Japanese obstetricians’ and gynecologists’ ideas for and against training in other departments.

Methods We sent questionnaires to obstetrics and gynecology (Ob-Gyn) specialists via a social networking service (SNS) in Japan. They answered anonymously using Google Forms over the internet.

Results The respondents comprised 120 Ob-Gyn specialists, and their age ranges of 28–29, 30–39, 40–49, and 50 or more, were 5.8%, 73.3%, 15.8%, and 5.0%, respectively. Only five Ob-Gyn specialists (4.2%) had experience in other departments, specifically gastrointestinal and urology. Ninety percent of them responded that they thought training in other departments was useful for developing clinical and surgical skills. In addition, 91.0% of respondents thought that surgical knowledge and skills were necessary in the clinical practice of gynecology, while 94% stated training in urology was also necessary. However, 49.2% of respondents answered that they may feel stress training in other departments where there were many issues, including a lack of personnel and difficulties securing cases.

Conclusion Many Ob-Gyn specialists think training in other departments is necessary, but potential problems include proper training implementation and stress management for residents. If additional training is enforced, greater flexibility in each facility will be required.

Content from these authors
© 2019 Tottori University Faculty of Medicine
Previous article Next article