The use of nonwoven fabrics or cheesecloth for covering crops has become a common practice to promote crop growth or to protect crops from extreme weather or pests. The term, “row cover”, is used in the present study to refer to this type of covering. There are several different ways of employing a “row cover”, e. g. direct covering without any supporting materials (contact type), and the use of simple frame structures for suspension of the cover (floating type). There are many kinds of row covers, each differing in material and/or in porosity. These differences in covering method or row cover type can affect the microclimate under the row cover. In the present study, the longwave length radiation properties of several row covers were determined and their effects on nocturnal radiation and leaf temperature under the row cover were examined.
Longwave length radiation properties, i.e., transmissivity, emissivity and reflectivity of the five different commercial row covers (A, B, C, D and E) were measured by the method proposed by Okada (1983). The porosity of the row covers was photographically determined. The results are shown in table 1. The relationship between transmissivity and porosity of the row cover is plotted in Fig. 1. The transmissivity depended linearly on the porosity except for row cover C. Row cover C is made from a highly transmissive material polypropylene, while the rest of the row covers are made from materials with low transmissivity, e.g. polyester (A and B) or polyvinylalcohol (D and E).
To express the reduction ratio of nocturnal net radiation flux under the row cover to the outside, a protection index
PI, as given by Eq. 1, was used. The
PI of each film was measured in field experiments. The
PI was clearly related to the transmissivity (Fig. 2) as shown in the empirical Eq. 6 developed from the data.
Based on the heat balance of a leaf surface, Eq. 5 was derived to estimate the temperature difference between a leaf and the ambient air. The differences calculated from this equation showed good agreement with those observed on the model leaf during night period.
By using Eq. 5, the relationship to describe the temperature difference between a leaf and the surrounding air within a space covered by a row cover and the
PI was predicted (Fig. 4). The point of
PI=0 corresponds to an uncovered condition in Fig. 4. From this figure, the leaf temperature under the row cover can be compared to an uncovered one. Assuming a floating type of row cover with open sides where the air temperature and wind speed are the same as the outside, the difference in the leaf temperature between covered and uncovered condition is about 2°C at a wind speed of 10cm/s and
PI=0.5. The leaf temperature under a row cover could drop below the outside air temperature for a contact type covering, where the wind speed typically is only one tenth of the outside wind speed. These tendencies agreed well with measured data given in previous reports.
抄録全体を表示