The poor in developing countries must sometimes resort to informal activities that are not allowed by authorities because they have no other choice. This paper examines why the poor in Metro Manila have adopted anti-informality as a social norm since the mid-2010s, despite understanding one another’s predicament. This paper explores this question by considering a case of electricity theft in a slum area, focusing on the viewpoints of those who steal electricity compared with those who do not. While slum residents used to disapprove of electricity theft because it posed a fire risk, they nevertheless justified it on the grounds that the initial cost of obtaining a formal electricity contract was too high. However, the residents have recently stopped tolerating electricity theft because of two recent developments. First, some residents have become unable to steal electricity due to technical measures against electricity theft and have come to criticize those who continue to steal and pay less money for electricity because they view it as unfair. Second, the residents have come to think that changes in government policies under the Duterte administration may reduce the initial cost of obtaining a formal electricity contract, making it difficult for electricity thieves to justify their actions.
View full abstract