In the Indian federal system, the national integration of peripheral regions, such as Jammu and Kashmir and the northeastern states, has been a major concern of the central government. In this article, I investigate the actual situation of the northeastern states, mainly in terms of center -state relations, with special reference to the Sanjib Baruah’s conceptualization of “cosmetic federalism”. Since India’s independence in 1947, the northeastern states have experienced various kinds of turmoil, including violent separatist movements and repression by central government, ethnic conflicts, anti-foreigner movements, and the establishment of local autocracy in some regions. The central government, therefore, has devised several powerful means to control such turmoil, which is not seen in the other states. There is recognition of state status or special autonomous status for the rebellious ethnic groups, massive financial assistance, repressive laws, and other means, which, according to Baruah, have made the federal system of this region superficial. This paper examines the substance of “cosmetic federalism”, including both institutional and non-institutional aspects, on the basis of the concrete data and published materials. It can be concluded that the central government has forced “cosmetic federalism” onto the region, but that the region’s states have adapted to it and sometimes utilize it to their advantage.
View full abstract