Purpose: This study aimed to identify factors influencing the survival and success rates of indirectly fabricated fiber post-based resin cores (FC) and metal cores (MC).
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on patients at Hokkaido University Hospital, comparing the FC and MC groups. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used for survival time analysis. Information on multiple factors, including remaining tooth structure height and final prosthetic material, was collected and analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. The cutoff values for remaining tooth structure height were determined by ROC curve analysis.
Results: A total of 233 teeth, comprising FC (199 teeth) and MC (34 teeth), were included. No significant difference was found between the two groups in survival and success rates five years after core placement. Maximum height of remaining tooth structure (MaxH) and the elastic modulus of the final prosthetic material were independently identified as significant prognostic factors for survival and success rates. Specifically, the prognosis worsened in cases where MaxH was 2.0 mm or less for survival rate and 2.5 mm or less for success rate, and where crowns made of materials with a low elastic modulus were used.
Discussion: Securing a MaxH above a certain threshold may have mitigated stress concentration on the core, thereby reducing the risk of decementation, fracture, and other complications. Furthermore, crowns made of materials with a high elastic modulus, such as metal or zirconia, suppressed excessive stress transmission to the root under occlusal force compared to those made of materials with a low elastic modulus, such as resin.
Conclusion: The study suggests there may be no difference in the five-year prognosis between FC and MC. The findings suggest that MaxH greater than 2.5 mm and the use of a dental crown with a high elastic modulus may be associated with a better prognosis of the core build-up.
View full abstract