Because
Campylobacter jejuni is most frequently identified as a causative organism of bacterial enteritis in pediatrics, a study was done to evaluate the clinical efficacy against
Campylobacter enteritis and the safety of a macrolide antibiotic, rokitamycin (RKM).In case of acute enteritis, RKM was used in a form of dry syrup at a dose level of approximately30mg (in potency) /kg body weight and its efficacy and safety were compared to those of fosfomycin (FOM) dry syrup which is currently in use at a dose level of60mg (in potency) /kg.Both drugs were administered, as a rule, in3divided daily dose (RKM before meal and FOM after meal) for 5consecutive days.Comparisons of the drugs were made using a well-controlled method. Obtained results are summarized as follows.
1.No significant differences in background factors of the2drug groups were apparent, hence it was deemed that no obstacles existed in making comparative studies of the2groups with regard to their efficacies and safeties.
2.Overall efficacy rate against
Campylobacter enteritis was100%in the RKM group with a rate of excellent efficacy of91.3%and the former was94.4%in the FOM group with the latter of72.2%.Though the RKM group apparently showed higher rates by5.6%and19.1%, respectively, for overall and excellent efficacies, they were not statistically significant as both drugs showed good efficacies.When acute cases of enteritis other than those caused by Campylobacter were included in the analysis, overall efficacy rates and rates of excellent efficacy were, respectively, 97.6%and85.7%for the RKM group and88.6%and68.2%for the FOM group, thus RKM showed higher efficacy rates by9.0%and17.5%, respectively.These differences were deemed statistically significant using the
U-test.
3.Numbers of days required for most of the major symptoms to subside were3days or less for the group for which RKM was used against
Campylobacter enteritis.Similar results were observed for the FOM group also.In cases of acute enteritis due to other causes than
Campylobacter, slower recoveries were observed for both the RKM and the FOM groups than in
Campylobacter enteritis cases, with the latter group slower than the former.In cases of puruloid stool, the recovery in the RKM group was significantly faster by
U-test than the FOM group, and a similar trend was observed overall.
4.Bacteriologically, the eradication rate of
Campylobacter in the RKM group was very good at91.3%with the FOM group showing a rate of78.9%.Though the RKM group showed an eradication rate12.4%higher than the FOM group, no statistical significance was found. When other causative organisms were included in addition to
C.jejuni, the eradication rate in the RKM group was86.7%whereas in the FOM group was76.9%.Though the former was higher by9.8%, no significant difference existed.
5.Numbers of days required for the eradication of
C.jejuni was somewhat shorter in theRKM group than in the FOM group, but again, no significant difference was found.Eradication of
Salmonella spp.required somewhat shorter length of time in the RKM group than in the FOM group, but again without significance.The RKM group showed significant delay upon the
U-test) compared to the FOM group in eradicating enteropathogenic
Escherichia coli (EPEC), but no significance was found overall.
6.No side effect was observed in either group.In laboratory tests, 1case of eosinophilia was observed in each of the2groups, and slight simultaneous increases in GOT and GPT values were observed in1case in the RKM group.No significant differences, however, were recognized between the2groups with regard to either side effects or laboratory test results. Incidentally, no refusal of administration of either drug preparation was noted.
View full abstract