In vitro studies were undertaken on clinically isolated strains of various bacteria to examine the antibacterial activity of ampicillin (AB-PC), carbenicillin (CB-PC), sulbenicillin (SB-PC), cephalothin (CET), cefazolin (CEZ) and gentamicin (GM).
Fifty three % of
Escherichia coil strains, 53.3% of
Citrobacter sp., 80% of
Proteus mirabills, 42.9% of
Morganella and 80% of
Bacteroides sp. were susceptible (MIC being not higher than 12.5 μg/ml) to AB-PC. The eight other species were not so susceptible to this penicillin.
CB-PC and SB-PC were almost as effective as AB-PC against
Escherichia coil and
Citrobactersp. They were less active against
Kiebsiella sp., but more active against
Enterobacter sp.,
Serratia sp., indole-positive
Proteus group and
Pseudomonas sp. than AB-PC. SB-PC was more effective than CB-PC against
Pseudomonas sp. The strains of
Pseudomonas sp. which were resistant to higher concentrations of CB-PC and SB-PC were pyocyanine-negative strains.
All strains (100%) of
Escherichia coil,
Klebsiella sp. and
Citrobacter sp. were susceptible to CET and CEZ, while none of
Enterobacter sp.,
Serratia sp.,
Proteus vulgaris, Morganella, Rettgerella, Providencia and Pseudomonas sp. were susceptible to these cephalosporins. The MICs of CET and CEZ against
Bacteroides sp. were moderately low.
Some strains of
Providencia and
Alkaligenes sp. were resistant to GM but the other 10 species were not resistant to this antibiotic, though it showed comparatively high MICs against
Bacteroidessp.
When seen from the MIC distribution of each antibiotic, there was a tendency that the strains isolated from the pus were more resistant than those isolated from the other sources (urine, sputum and bile).
View full abstract