We conducted a pharmacokinetic and clinical study on cefpirome (HR 810, CPR), an aminothiazolylmethoxyiminoacetamido cephalosporin (ATOIC), and obtained the following results.
1. Concentrations in blood/excretion in urine
We studied pharmacokinetic in children upon intravenous bolus injections and 30-minute and 1-hour intravenous drip infusions in single dosages of lO, 20, and 40mg/kg, andobtained virtually the same results as those found inadult subjects. Upon intravenous bolus injections, mean blood concentrations 30 minutes after administration of 10, 20, and 40mg/kg were26.1, 47.8, and 82.8 μg/ml, respectively, and half-liveswere 1.13, 1.43, and 1.26 hours, respectively. Upon 30-minute intravenous drip infUsion, mean blood concentrations on completion of the drip infusions of 10, 20, and 40mg/kg were 43.2, 106.9, and l63.0μg/ml, respectively, and half4ives were1.15, 1.09, and 1.15 hours, respectively. In addition, upon 1-hour intravenous drip infusion, mean blood concentrations on completion of infusion were27.1μg/ml for 10mg/kg and 475μg/ml for 20mg/kg, and half-lives were l.09 and 1.40 hours, respectively. A clear dose response was observed at all dosages for either administration method. Mean excretion rates in urine in the first 8 hours after administration were 60.6-71.1% upon intravenous bolus injections of 10-40mg/kg, and upon intravenous drip infusion, thevalues were 50.2-83.8% for administration of 10-40mg/kg 6 or 7 hours after completion of drip infusion.
2. Concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid
Penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid was studied in 2 subjects, and a concentration of 0.28-5.19μg/ml was observed upon administration of 50mg/kg, a moderate degree of penetration compared to the penetration of cephalosporins of group 5 studied up to now.
3. Clinical results
Evaluation of clinical effects of CPR on various types of bacterial infections was conducted in 56 subjects, excluding 3 subjects who had diseases which were excluded from the study. The breakdown was as follows: 3 cases of meningitis, 1 case of septicemia, 25 cases of bronchial pneumonia, 1 case each of tonsillitis and infection of the external acoustic meatus, 2 caseseach of scarlet fever and phlegmon, 8 cases each of lymphadenitis and urinary tract infections, and 5 cases of staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. Results of excellent or good were obtained in 54 subjects for an efficacy rate of 96.4%.
There were 6 cases of mixed infections (2 cases of
Haemophilus influenzae+
Staphylococcus aureus, 1 case each of
H.ifluenzae+
Streptococcus pyogenes and
H.influenzae+
Branhamella catarrhalis, and 2 cases of
H.influenzae+
Streptococcus pneumoniae), 37 cases of single infections, 22 cases of Gram-positive cocci (12 cases of
S. aureus, 4 cases of
S. Pyogenes, and 6 cases of
S.pneumoniae), and 15 cases of Gram-negative bacilli (1 case each of
B. catarrhalis,
Proteus mirabilis,
Haemophilus parainfluenzae,
Pseudomonas fluorescens, 6 cases of
H. influenzae and 5 cases of
Escherichia coli). Causative bacteria were confirmed in 43 of 56 cases, eradication of the bacteria was observed during the course of the study in 40 cases, excluding 1 case each of single infections with
S. aureus,
S. pneumoniae and
P. fluorescens which were unevaluable, thus an eradication rate of 100% was obtained. From these clinical results according to individual types of bacteria isolated, it appears that CPR was effective in all cases except pneumonia resulting from
S. pneumoniae, for a total of 42 of 43 cases with an efficacy rate of 97.7%.
4. Side effects and clinical laboratory findings
A study of safety was conducted on a total of 59 subjects, including 3 subjects with mycoplasmal pneumonia who were excluded.
View full abstract