The purpose of this study is to reexamine the nature of revision with a particular reference to the relationship between revision and 'reading' (reading that is conducted in the writing process). Recent process-oriented writing research has assumed that the manner of conducting revision differentiates the skilled from the less skilled writer, and this difference gives rise to the differing quality of written product. However, the problem is that why this difference occurs has not been made clear. In this study, it is assumed that the function of 'reading' is the crucial factor which affects the quality of revision to a great extent. Then the study was implemented to scrutinize how 'reading' works in the writing process. As a result of text analysis, it became clear that the essays produced without 'reading,' especially macro-level 'reading,' have certain characteristics compared to the essays produced under the normal condition. Specifically, (1) dispersion of focus, (2) lack of transition markers, (3) digression within a paragraph, and (4) repetitious use of words were observed. Therefore, it appears that the degree of success in 'reading' is one of the main causes determining the quality of revision.
View full abstract