A comparative histopathological study on the organ specificity of experimental allergic thyroiditis (EAT) in guinea pigs produced by a single injection of homologous thyroid extract in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) has been made. The controls consisted of the following three groups; the first group received a single injection of homologous nervous tissue in CFA (Group EAE^*); the second two injections of homologous adrenal tissue in CFA (Group EAA^<**>); and the third a single injection of saline in CFA (Group CFA). Comparison between the thyroiditic and the control groups was done concerning the incidence, severity and nature of inflammatory changes occurring in the thyroid and other several parenchymatous organs. There was a marked increase in incidence and severity of the inflammatory changes of the thyroid in Group EAT as compared with all the control groups. The thyroid lesions in Group EAT were characterized by: (1) a diffused character of interstitial cellular infiltrates, especially around the inter lobular venules, (2) plemorphism in the infiltrating cell types, being composed of lymphocytes, histiocytes, monocytes, macrophages, plasma cells, large basophilic blastoid cells, granulocytes, etc., (3) invasion and disruption of the thyroid follicles chiefly mononuclear cells, and (4) an associated glandular hyperplasia, especially formation of cords and nests of epithelial cell without readily recognizable lumen. On the contrary, the thyroid changes in the controls were provided by: (1) a minute focal interstitial infiltrate, particularly a small, circumscribed perivascular cuff, (2) relative monotonity in the infiltrating cell types, (3) a lack of the'invasive'aciner changes, and (4) minimal or no evidence of glandular hyperplasia. On the other hand, the'background'lesions, i.e. disseminated lesions found in organs other than each target organ in Groups EAT, EAE, and EAA, as well as generalized lesions in Group CFA, were equally minute, focal mononuclear infiltrates and/or microgranulomas, particularly around the venules and capillaries, except for the pulmonary lesions. No significant differences in the intensity and character of the'background'lesions were recognizable among each group. It seems reasonable to conclude from these evidences that (1) the'background'lesions are not due to the presence of tissue antigens in the injected materials, but should be regarded as a nonspecific reaction to the injected adjuvant, and (2) the thyroid pictures in Group EAT may be interpreted largely as the results of organ-specific antigen stimulation.
View full abstract