The author investigated the body measurements, the physical strength and the exercise capacity of 484 boys and girls (9-12 years old) of the Elementary School attached to the Ikeda Branch School, Osaka Educational University (A) and the Toyonaka Municipal Elementary School (B) in June 1952.
Ikeda and Toyonaka, where these two schools are located are satellite cities of Osaka. They have similar characteristics and therefore it may be presumed that environmental factors account for the differences between the children of these two schools. These factors include the characteristics of each school, the economic and the cultural living conditions of the children etc. as determined by a simple questionnaire investigation. These differences seem to be attributable to the fact that one is an attached school to the educational university and another is a common public school.
Using the data obtained, the author drew comparisons between the differences of physical traits according to environmental factors that seem to differ. Fig. 1 is Mollison's variation curve (base line: the 4th year children of B school). The asterisk (*) on the right side of this figure give the results of statistical tests between the means of these two school's children. Table 1 gives the means (χ), the numbers (n) and the unbiased variances (u
2) of the children of these two schools by annual groupings. Fig. 2 is the growth curve that connects the means of the divided groups at intervals of six months. Table 2 is the result of statistical tests between the means of these age groups. The double asterisk (**) indicates the significant differences at a 1% level of significance and mark (*) shows them at a 5% level of significance.
The results are as follows:
(1) Comparing the means for measurements obtained in these two schools with the averages of schools throughout the nation (April 1952) for stature, weight and girth of chest, the means for these schools are inferior to the averages only in girth of chest; a tendency quite general among urban children.
(2) The year group differences in physical traits are greater among the girls than among the boys, and it seems that this is due to the earlier preparation of girls for puberty.
(3) The differences in physical traits between the boys of the two schools is greater than among the girls.
(4) The children of A school are generally superior to those of B school in all traits. The A school children are taller and have longer lower limbs (especially the thighs), although they have shorter trunks in comparison with those of B school. And also the A school children are superior in girth measurements and weight to those of B school.
(5) It seems that the growth of the A school children may be somewhat more rapid in comparison with those of the B school. These results (3-5) are similar to the effects by the profitable environments mentioned by APPLETON, SUZUKI, ISHIHARA and IIDAKA, etc.
(6) The B school children are superior in back muscle strength and ball throwing as well as in the length of the trunk and chest, and in the sagittal length of the cheat, but are inferior in grip strength, lung capacity, and the 50m. running broad jump, to those of A school.
(7) But these differences in physical traits seem to decrease with age except for girth measurements which are especially effected by nutritional conditions.
(8) Although these three physical traits must be considered interrelatedly, the differences in physical traits between the children of these two schools seem to be attributable more to differences in economic and cultural environmental conditions than simply to physical training in the respective schools.
抄録全体を表示